Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-200932

ABSTRACT

Background:Isolated zygomatic or malar bone fractures are second most common fracture among facial skeletal injuries. It has been reported that three point fixation is appropriate for isolated zygomaticbone fracture. The objective of current study was to compare the mean difference in terms of malar height outcome by using different fixation techniques (two point and three point)in patients with zygomatic complex fracture.Methods:This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, MMDC, Multan, during a period of six months from 1st June 2017 to 30th November 2017. A total 182 patients of both genders were included in this study. Two point fixation techniques were used in Group-A patients. While 3 point fixation was used in Group-B patients. After 6 weeks follow-up, patients were assessed for malar height. Outcome was measured by comparing the mean difference of pre and postoperative malar height of both techniques. Data were analyzed using computer program SPSS-21. P≤0.05 was taken as significant in all analysis.Results:Among patients in two pointfixation group, the mean malar height was 67.55±2.98 mm and in three pointfixation group, meansmalar height was 71.55±2.36 mm. The difference of malar height among two treatments was highly significant with p<0.01. Conclusions: Using three point fixation results better as compared to two point fixations in terms of malar height outcome

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-204955

ABSTRACT

Objective: Impacted third molars are a major problem in modern dentistry and the decision of whether to remove an impacted third molar is probably one of the most frequent treatment decisions faced by dentists. Impacted mandibular third molars are often associated with pericoronitis, periodontitis, cystic lesions, neoplasm, and pathological root resorption and can cause detrimental effects on the adjacent tooth. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the frequency of different types of mandibular third molar impactions. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the outdoor patient Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Multan Medical and Dental College, Multan during a period of 6 months from 15 December 2017 to 14 June 2018. After written informed consent, a total of 200 patients were recruited, diagnosed clinically and radiographically as having impacted mandibular 3rd molar. Angulation of impacted third molar was classified according to the long axis of the adjacent second molar on periapical and OPG radiographs. Statistical analysis was done through SPSS version 20. Results: Out of 200 patients, the frequency of mesioangular, vertical, distoangular, and horizontal impactions were 84 (42%), 60 (30%), 40 (20%), and 16 (8%) respectively. The depths of the impactions were 67 (33.5%) depth A, 92 (46%) depth B, and 41 (20.5%) depth C. Conclusion: Mesioangular impaction was more common followed by vertical. Depth B was the most common.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL