ABSTRACT
<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The SingHealth Residency General Surgery Programme replaced the basic and advanced specialist training (AST) system in Singapore in 2010. The relative merits of both systems continue to be debated, especially the operational readiness of graduating residents. We set out to compare the operative and endoscopic volumes of graduates from the AST system with those from the first graduating batch of the residency programme during their registrar (or equivalent) years, as a reflection of procedural experience gained during traineeship.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Operative and endoscopic records of four graduating residents and seven AST system trainees were extracted from the cluster-wide Operating Theatre Management system and compared. Surgeries were analysed as registrar-level operations and their corresponding subspecialties.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Registrars and senior residents performed a mean of 1,182 and 533 general surgical operations, respectively. Median percentage loss in operative volume was 50.6% (range 9.6%-75.5%). The mean number of total gastroscopies and colonoscopies performed by registrars (total gastroscopy, n = 819; total colonoscopy, n = 743) and senior residents (total gastroscopy, n = 376; total colonoscopy, n = 412) indicated a mean loss of 54.1% and 44.6%, respectively, in gastroscopic and colonoscopic experience.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The residency programme aims to provide robust and complete surgical training. The operational readiness of its graduates is often scrutinised against that from the old system. Although a significant difference in surgical and endoscopic volumes was observed between the two trainee groups, this is only one marker of surgical experience and technical competence.</p>