Frequency and causes for exclusion from randomization of healthy volunteers screened for a phase 1 study in India.

Background. Only a proportion of screened potential participants were actually randomized while conducting a phase 1 study of a humanized rabies monoclonal antibody. We aimed to assess the challenges in defining who is a normal volunteer and the issues that affect volunteer recruitment and thus accrual. Methods. One hundred and fifty-six volunteers were screened and 74 (47.4%) were randomized in a phase 1 study. Data on all participants screened for the study were analysed and reasons for their non-randomization were classified. Results. The reasons for volunteers not being randomized were: (i) deranged laboratory parameters (n=62); (ii) nonlaboratory causes (n=4); and (iii) withdrawal of consent (n=16). A large proportion of screen failures were due to low haemoglobin levels, which led to the protocol being amended midway during the study. An informal interview of those who declined consent showed that they had only wanted to get themselves investigated thoroughly or were interested in getting their HIV status evaluated. Conclusions. Our study shows that <50% participants screened for a phase 1 study in a developing country actually get randomized. The main reason for non-randomization is abnormal laboratory tests. This may help investigators and sponsors to plan protocols better, define normal ranges with acceptable variations based on their own populations a priori and have more pragmatic accrual targets.

Use of liposomal amphotericin B in bone marrow transplant.

Increasing number of transplants worldwide has resulted in an increase in the incidence of fungal infections. Prolonged neutropenia, immunosuppression and graft vs. host disease all result in high predisposition to fungal infections. The likelihood of developing a fungal infection increases with the severity and duration of neutropenia, which, in the case of cancer or chemotherapy for the treatment of hematological malignancies, can range from a few days to several weeks. Invasive fungal infections are difficult to diagnose and neutropenic patients with fever often receive empirical antifungal therapy. This provides a rationale for the prophylactic use of antifungal agents. The empirical use of liposomal amphotericin B has overcome some of the difficulties usually found in this setting. The majority of clinical efficacy data related to liposomal amphotericin B are derived from compassionate use studies and case series. The major advantage of these liposomal formulations of amphotericin B is a reduction in amphotercin toxicity. Use of liposomal amphotericin has been shown to be a cost-effective approach abroad and the same has been our experience also. Commercially ambisome and Fungisome are the only products that contain true liposomes. Unlike ambisome, which needs to be used in dose of 3 mg/kg/day Fungisome is effective in the dose of 1-3 mg/kg bodyweight. The Indian liposomal preparation has shown to be safe and effective used in over 150 transplant patients in our experience. We conclude that the liposomal amphotericin is better-tolerated and also gives,better responses in documented fungal infections.

The carcinoma of parathyroid gland.

Parathyroid carcinoma constitutes less than 1% of primary hyperparathyroidism. The exact etiology is not known. Prior radiation to neck, chronic renal failure and genetic factors are thought to play a role. The male to female ratio is one. Parathyroid carcinomas are slow growing, have a tendency to recur locally and metastasize late. 95% of parathyroid carcinomas are functioning. The major distinguishing features of malignant hyperparathyroidism are presence of a palpable mass in the neck and features of severe hypercalcemia. By far the most important test to diagnose primary hyperparathyroidism is serum level of Immunoreactive PTH. The diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism is essentially clinical and biochemical. Biopsy is not necessary before definitive surgery. CT scan appears to be the best investigation for detecting the primary tumor, its local extent and metastases. Most of the symptoms are attributable to hypercalcemia, which needs to be treated aggressively. Early surgery with 'en bloc' resection of the tumor is the only potentially curative treatment. Parathyroid carcinoma is traditionally said to be resistant to radiotherapy. Various chemotherapeutic agents have been used with partial anecdotal responses. The 5-year survival is about 50% and 10-year survival varies from 13-49%.