Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Pediatr ; 2010 Feb; 77(2): 151-154
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-142491

ABSTRACT

Objective. To compare prolonged inter hospital long distance transports on road undertaken by a qualified transport team vs those done by the same team from shorter distances and time. Methods. Retrospective descriptive comparative study of the neonatal transports done during a period of 48 mo. All neonates transferred on road to a tertiary level pediatric hospital from various maternity and pediatric centers. The biochemical characteristics, adverse effects during transport and 24 hr survival after the transport in both the groups were compared. Results. The babies were comparable in their gestational age and ventilatory requirements (46% vs 39%). The biochemical and metabolic characteristics and 24 hr mortality rates for babies who were transported for longer times and distances were comparable (p value =0.75) to those transported for shorter times. Conclusion. Long distance neonatal transport on road is feasible and with a qualified team results can be comparable to those transported from shorter distances.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
Indian Pediatr ; 2008 Nov; 45(11): 920-2
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-12974

ABSTRACT

This study compares the inter hospital long distance transports undertaken by a qualified transport team versus those done by other means. This was a retrospective descriptive comparative study of the neonatal transports done during a period of 33 months from various maternity and pediatric centers to a pediatric tertiary referral centre. We found that biochemical and temperature disturbances are more common in babies transported on their own and a specialized neonatal transport service could improve the survival of these babies. Survival was 96.2% (154/160) and 89% (114/128) in the two groups, respectively (P=0.03).


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Patient Transfer , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL