Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics ; : 90-92, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-78897

ABSTRACT

Although periapical inflammatory lesions are usually resulted by infection in the root canal system, this rare case showed that a periapical lesion related to an infected tooth may cause pulpal necrosis in adjacent intact tooth, with no history or clinical signs of caries, disease, trauma or developmental anomaly. This case also suggests that the periapical lesion can be treated conservatively, without surgical intervention. Furthermore, this case highlights the importance of prompt treatment of apical periodontitis before the lesion becomes extensive as well as follows up of large lesions.


Subject(s)
Bicuspid , Dental Pulp Cavity , Dental Pulp Necrosis , Necrosis , Periapical Periodontitis , Tooth
2.
IEJ-Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2009; 4 (3): 106-111
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-110622

ABSTRACT

Biocompatibility is a desirable feature for root-end filling materials. In this study we aimed to compare a new material called cold ceramic [CC] with intermediate restorative material [IRM] and mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA] using Methyl-tetrazolium bromide [MTT] assay. The materials were tested in fresh and set states: [n=108]. The cytotoxicity was compared using L929 fibroblasts as an indicator; tested materials were eluted with culture medium according to ISO: 109935 standard. Distilled water and culture medium served as positive and negative controls, respectively [n=36]. The results were evaluated at 1, 24 hours and 7 days. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA for each time interval and material status and t-tests. The cytotoxicity of the tested materials were statistically different at the various time intervals [P<0.001]. IRM was the most cytotoxic root-end filling material [P<0.001], MTA demonstrated the least cytotoxicity followed by CC. Despite displaying the greatest cytotoxicity, IRM is approved by the American Food and Drug Administration [PDA]. Cold ceramic had significantly lower cytotoxicity compared to IRM, in all but one subgroup. Further investigations are required to assess the clinical applicability of this novel material


Subject(s)
Ceramics/toxicity , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Oxides/toxicity , Fibroblasts , Aluminum Compounds , Calcium Compounds , Silicates , Drug Combinations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL