ABSTRACT
Three-dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is a fabrication technology that constructs three-dimensional objects by successive addition of materials. In recent years, the advancements in 3D printing technology, reductions in material costs, development of biomaterials, and improvements in cell culture techniques allow the application of 3D printing in the clinical medical fields, such as orthopedics, dentistry, and urinary surgery, to develop rapidly. Obstetrics, focusing on both theory and practice, is an emerging application field for 3D printing technology. 3D printing has been used in obstetrics for fetal and maternal diseases, such as prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities and preoperative planning for placental implantation disorders. Additionally, 3D printing can simulate surgical scenarios and enable the targeted training for doctors. This review aims to provide a summary of the latest developments in the clinical application of 3D printing in obstetrics.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate whether the number of previous cesarean sections affects the outcomes of patients with placental implantation disease undergoing hysterectomy.Methods:Using a retrospective cohort study design, the study samples were from the obstetric clinical database of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and the study subjects were patients with placental implantation disease who underwent hysterectomy. Patients were grouped according to different previous cesarean section frequencies, and their clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and adverse maternal outcomes were compared in each group; The impact of previous cesarean sections on adverse outcomes in pregnant women was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.Results:Among the 244 enrolled patients, 26 had no previous history of cesarean section (11%), 132 had a previous cesarean section once (54%), and 86 had a previous cesarean section ≥2 times (35%). There was no statistically significant difference in the usage rates of uterine artery embolization, suture hemostasis, and internal iliac artery embolization among the three groups of patients (all P>0.05). Among the adverse outcomes of pregnant and postpartum women, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of shock, bladder injury, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage >1 500 ml, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and transfusion of blood products among the three groups (all P>0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the number of previous cesarean sections did not increase the risk of adverse outcomes, such as shock, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage ≥1 500 ml, entry into the ICU, and transfusion of blood products. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that the number of previous cesarean sections did not increase the risk of adverse outcomes in pregnant women. Conclusions:For patients with placental implantation disease undergoing hysterectomy, the number of previous cesarean sections may not be the main factor determining maternal outcomes. It is necessary to consider other possible influencing factors more comprehensively, including previous uterine surgery history, basic health status of pregnant women, comorbidities, and availability of medical resources.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the safety of the Triple-P procedure in women complicated with severe placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS) and its influence on second pregnancy.Methods:From January 2015 to December 2017, the outcomes of the second pregnancy after the Triple-P procedure in 11 pregnant women complicated with PAS in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed.Results:By December 2021, a total of 11 pregnant women who underwent the Triple-P procedure for PAS had a second pregnancy, with a median interval of 3 years (2-3 years). Of the 11 pregnant women, 7 delivered after 36 weeks of gestation. The median gestational age was 38 weeks, and 4 terminated within the first trimester. PAS recurred in 1 of 7 pregnant women (1/7) and was associated with placenta previa. All of the 7 pregnant women were delivered by cesarean section, with a median postpartum blood loss of 300 ml (200-450 ml), and only one pregnant woman required blood transfusion. None of the pregnant women were transferred to the intensive care unit, and there were no uterine rupture, bladder injury, puerperal infection, and neonatal adverse outcomes.Conclusion:Pregnant women who underwent the Triple-P procedure for severe PAS could be considered for second pregnancy with strictly management by an experienced multidisciplinary team, which may result in a good outcome.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effects of placenta previa on the surgical and pregnancy outcomes in patients with total/subtotal or segmental hysterectomy attributed to placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS).Methods:This study retrospectively enrolled 510 patients who gave birth and underwent total/subtotal hysterectomy or segmental hysterectomy (local implantation site) due to PAS at the third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022. These subjects were divided into the placenta previa group (427 cases) and non-placenta previa group (83 cases). According to the type of hysterectomy, they were further divided into the total/subtotal hysterectomy and placenta previa subgroup (221 cases), total/subtotal hysterectomy and non-placenta previa subgroup (23 cases), segmental hysterectomy and placenta previa subgroup (206 cases), and segmental hysterectomy and non-placenta previa subgroup (60 cases). Nonparametric test or Chi-square test were used to compare the differences in the clinical features, surgical and pregnancy outcomes between different groups. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of placenta previa on the risk of additional surgical procedures and adverse maternal outcomes. Results:(1) Compared with the non-placenta previa group, the hemorrhage volume within 24 h postpartum [1 541 ml (1 036-2 368 ml) vs 1 111 ml (695-2 000 ml), Z=－3.91] and the proportion of women requiring additional surgical procedures [84.8% (362/427) vs 69.9% (58/83), χ2=10.61], with total/subtotal hysterectomy [51.8% (221/427) vs 27.7% (23/83), χ2=16.10], cystoscopy and/or ureteral stenting [60.7% (259/427) vs 31.3% (26/83), χ2=24.25], total adverse pregnancy outcomes [86.9% (371/427) vs 65.1% (54/83), χ2=17.75], hemorrhage volume>1 500 ml within 24 h postpartum [54.1% (231/427) vs 33.7% (28/83), χ2=29.94], transfusion of blood products [75.9% (324/427) vs 47.0% (39/83), χ2=28.27] were all higher in the placenta previa group (all P<0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis found that for PAS patients with hysterectomy, regardless of the hysterectomy type (total/subtotal/segmental), placenta previa was risk factor for requiring additional surgical procedures ( aOR=3.26, 95% CI: 1.85-5.72) and adverse pregnancy outcomes ( aOR=5.59, 95% CI: 2.01-6.42), even if adjusting for the confounding factors such as maternal age, number of previous cesarean sections, parity, gestational weight gain, twin pregnancy, and the use of assisted reproductive technology. (2) In patients with total/subtotal hysterectomy, the proportion of women requiring additional surgical procedures was higher in those with placenta previa [82.8% (183/221) vs 56.5% (13/23), χ2=9.11] than those without placenta previa, especially the proportion of cystoscopy and/or ureteral stenting [67.9% (150/221) vs 34.8% (8/23), χ2=9.99] (both P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found in adverse pregnancy outcomes [89.6% (198/221) vs 87.0% (20/23), χ2<0.01, P=0.972] between the two groups. In patients with segmental hysterectomy, higher proportions of women requiring additional surgery [86.9% (179/206) vs 75.0% (45/60), χ2=4.94], with adverse pregnancy outcomes [84.0% (173/206) vs 56.7% (34/60), χ2=25.31], cystoscopy and/or ureteral stenting [52.9% (109/206) vs 30.0% (18/60), χ2=9.78], vascular occlusion [94.2% (194/206) vs 71.7% (43/60), χ2=24.23], hemorrhage volume>1 500 ml within 24 h postpartum [46.6% (96/206) vs 23.3% (14/60), χ2=10.37], and transfusion of blood products [68.9% (142/206) vs 33.3% (20/60), χ2=24.73] were found in the placenta previa group (all P<0.05). Furthermore, patients with placenta previa had more hemorrhage volume within 24 h postpartum [1 368 ml (970-2 026 ml) vs 995 ml (654-1 352 ml), Z=－3.66, P<0.001] in the segmental hysterectomy subgroup. After adjusting for the confounding factors such as age, number of previous cesarean sections, parity, gestational weight gain, twin pregnancy, and the use of assisted reproductive technology, binary logistic regression analysis found that placenta previa did not increase the risk of additional surgical operations ( aOR=2.71, 95% CI: 0.99-7.42) and adverse pregnancy outcomes ( aOR=2.14, 95% CI: 0.54-8.42) in patients with total/subtotal hysterectomy but were risk factors of the two outcomes for those with segmental hysterectomy ( aOR=4.67, 95% CI: 2.15-10.10; aOR=3.80, 95% CI: 1.86-7.77). Conclusions:Placenta previa increases the risk of additional surgical procedures and adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with total/subtotal or segmental hysterectomy caused by PAS. Appropriate preparation is required after the clinical diagnosis of PAS with placenta previa.