Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy (D2).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Prognostic analysis of 1042 gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy (D2) was performed based on metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR), the N staging in the 6th and 7th edition of UICC staging system respectively. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and gradient monotonicity of these three staging methods were compared using linear trend χ(2), likelihood ratio χ(2) statistics and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to compare the prognostic value of these three staging methods.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The 5-year survival rate of 1042 patients was 47.5%. The metastatic lymph node ratio (P<0.01) and N staging of the 7th edition UICC (P<0.05) were independent prognostic factors according to univariate and multivariate analyses. The AUC was 0.754 in MLR staging group, higher than that in N staging of the 6th (0.692) and 7th (0.705) edition of UICC group. Compared to the 6th and 7th edition of UICC N staging group, homogeneity and linear curve were better and AIC value was lower in MLR staging group (7240.017 vs. 7364.073 and 7325.731).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Prognostic value of MLR staging is better than that of UICC N staging for patients undergoing radical gastric cancer resection. The MLR staging can be a new method of lymph node staging for gastric cancer patients.</p>

Combined APACH II score and arterial blood lactate clearance rate to predict the prognosis of ARDS patients

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the easily applicable indicators of practical value to evaluate the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).@*METHODS@#Blood and biochemical tests and blood-gas analyses were performed upon entry into the ICUs, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after that in 72 ARDS patients (who were admitted to the ICUs of our hospital from January 2000 to December 2009). Then APACHE II scores were achieved by combining relevant physiological parameters and laboratory results.@*RESULTS@#There was a statistical difference between the death group and survival group at different time points upon entering the ICUs in terms of APACHE II score, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference and arterial blood lactate clearance rate. PaO(2)/FiO(2) values were recorded to be statistically different between the death group and survival group 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, respectively after entry into the ICUs. In addition, registered linear regression existed between APACHE II score, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference or PaO(2)/FiO(2) value and time. APACHE II score 24 h and 72 h after entering ICUs predicted mortality with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) standing respectively at 0.919 and 0.955. Arterial blood lactate clearance rate 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after entering ICUs predicted mortality with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) at 0.918, 0.918, 0.909 and 0.991, respectively.@*CONCLUSIONS@#APACHE II score applied in combination with arterial blood lactate clearance rate is of clinical significance in assessing the prognosis of ARDS patients.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with chronic appendicitis / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with chronic appendicitis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Two hundred twenty- four patients were divided into laparoscopic group (n=98) and open appendectomy group (n=126) according to individual willing. Prospective non- randomized study was performed to compare the operative time, operative bleeding, hospitalization time, the discovery and management concerned in operation. Abdominal pain in these chronic appendicitis cases was followed up.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The operative time was (54.8+/-21.8) min in open group and (51.8+/-18.0) min in laparoscopic group (t=0.80,P > 0.05). The operative bleeding was (18.6+/-23.3) ml in open group and (9.8+/-4.7) ml in laparoscopic group (t=3.13, P < 0.05). The hospitalization time was (8.9+/-5.3) d in open group and (6.8+/-3.0) d in laparoscopic group (t=2.66,P < 0.05). Twenty- five cases had abdominal adhesion in laparoscopic group, including 9 cases of adhesion around appendix, 6 cases of adhesion between ileocecum and anterior or lateral abdominal wall, 4 cases of adhesion between epiploon and abdominal wall or intestines, 6 cases of adhesion around colon and others. All adhesion had been dissected. Fourteen cases adhesion around appendix had been discovered in 126 cases of open group and dissected (chi(2) =7.95,P < 0.05). In follow- up research, 24 cases still had chronic abdominal pain in 98 case of open group, and 9 cases had chronic abdominal pain in 87 of laparoscopic group, the difference was significant (chi(2)=6.29,P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The laparoscopic appendectomy possesses more advantages in treating chronic appendicitis and can decrease the incidence of chronic abdominal pain after operation.</p>