Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 42(3): 322-328, May-June 2020.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1132079

ABSTRACT

Although psychological treatments for depressive disorders are available, they are often expensive or inaccessible for many. Web-based interventions that require minimal or no contact with therapists have been shown effective. To the best of our knowledge, no study using this treatment format has been conducted in Brazil. The Deprexis program was designed using empirically established principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy to reduce depressive symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Deprexis in Brazil. This randomized controlled trial will include 128 Brazilians with clinically significant depression symptoms or who have been diagnosed with depressive disorder (major depressive disorder or dysthymia), recruited over the internet (Brazilian forums, social networks, or e-mail lists). Individuals with other psychiatric diagnoses that require significant attention (e.g., bipolar disorder, psychosis) will not be included in the trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to 1) treatment as usual plus immediate access to Deprexis or 2) treatment as usual plus delayed access to Deprexis (after 8 weeks). Participants will be able to obtain other treatment types in addition to the online intervention. If found effective, this web-based intervention would increase the evidence-based care options for depression treatment in Brazil. Clinical trial registration: RBR-6kk3bx, UTN U1111-1212-8998


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Internet-Based Intervention , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Time Factors , Brazil , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy
2.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 40(2): 123-127, Apr.-June 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-959224

ABSTRACT

Objective: A large proportion of psychotherapy patients remain untreated, mostly because they drop out. This study compares the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who dropped out of psychotherapy to those of therapy completers. Methods: The sample included 63 patients (23 dropouts and 40 completers) from a controlled clinical trial, which compared narrative therapy vs. cognitive-behavioral therapy for major depressive disorder. Patients were assessed at the eighth session, post-treatment, and at 31-month follow-up. Results: Dropouts improved less than completers by the last session attended, but continued to improve significantly more than completers during the follow-up period. Some dropout patients improved with a small dose of therapy (17% achieved a clinically significant change before abandoning treatment), while others only achieved clinically significant change after a longer period (62% at 31-month follow-up). Conclusion: These results emphasize the importance of dealing effectively with patients at risk of dropping out of therapy.Patients who dropped out also reported improvement of depressive symptoms without therapy, but took much longer to improve than did patients who completed therapy. This might be attributable to natural remission of depression. Further research should use a larger patient database, ideally gathered by meta-analysis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Narrative Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Patient Dropouts/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Time Factors , Follow-Up Studies , Patient Compliance , Treatment Outcome , Self Report
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL