Comparative leprosy vaccine trial in south India.

This report provides results from a controlled, double blind, randomized, prophylactic leprosy vaccine trial conducted in South India. Four vaccines, viz BCG, BCG+ killed M. leprae, M.w and ICRC were studied in this trial in comparison with normal saline placebo. From about 3,00,000 people, 2,16,000 were found eligible for vaccination and among them, 1,71,400 volunteered to participate in the study. Intake for the study was completed in two and a half years from January 1991. There was no instance of serious toxicity or side effects subsequent to vaccination for which premature decoding was required. All the vaccine candidates were safe for human use. Decoding was done after the completion of the second resurvey in December 1998. Results for vaccine efficacy are based on examination of more than 70% of the original "vaccinated" cohort population, in both the first and the second resurveys. It was possible to assess the overall protective efficacy of the candidate vaccines against leprosy as such. Observed incidence rates were not sufficiently high to ascertain the protective efficacy of the candidate vaccines against progressive and serious forms of leprosy. BCG+ killed M. leprae provided 64% protection (CI 50.4-73.9), ICRC provided 65.5% protection (CI 48.0-77.0), M.w gave 25.7% protection (CI 1.9-43.8) and BCG gave 34.1% protection (CI 13.5-49.8). Protection observed with the ICRC vaccine and the combination vaccine (BCG+ killed M. leprae) meets the requirement of public health utility and these vaccines deserve further consideration for their ultimate applicability in leprosy prevention.

Inter-observer agreement and clinical diagnosis of leprosy for prophylaxis studies.

Clinical diagnosis is still the most useful tool for detecting early cases of leprosy in field research. In prophylaxis studies accuracy of clinical diagnosis of leprosy is important during intake as well as for measuring efficacy of the intervention. This paper reports our observations regarding the extent of inter-observer variations in clinical diagnosis of leprosy and its implications for a prophylaxis study. Information on 225 suspects and cases of leprosy, each examined independently by three senior workers after initial standardization, was used for this purpose. Agreement among the examiners regarding the presence of skin patch, thickened nerve trunk and sensory deficit was fairly high (Kappa = 0.7). Agreement on the presence of infiltration in a skin patch was not satisfactory (Kappa = 0.4-0.5). It was observed that in clinical diagnosis of leprosy, presence of skin patch and sensory deficit, as well as thickened nerve trunk and related anaesthesia were correlated observations. The influence of inter-observer variations on defining leprosy problem in the community can be quite large. The paper suggests some ways of overcoming the problem.