Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Rev. CEFAC ; 16(4): 1109-1116, Jul-Aug/2014. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-724045

ABSTRACT

Objetivo verificar quais médias tonais possuem maior correlação com o Limiar de Recepção da Fala e com o Índice de Reconhecimento da Fala. Métodos foram selecionados 241 exames de pacientes idosos com perda auditiva neurossensorial que realizaram audiometria tonal liminar e logoaudiometria. As avaliações audiométricas foram classificados com base nos limiares tonais de via aérea das seguinte formas: Média 1- Média das frequências de 500, 1000 e 2000 Hz; Média2-Média das frequências de 500, 1000, 2000 e 4000 Hz; Média 3 – Média das frequências de 500, 1000, 2000 e 3000 Hz e Média 4 –Média das frequências de 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 e 4000 Hz. Os dados foram comparados com os testesLimiar de Recepção da Fala e Índice de Reconhecimento da Fala e tratados estatisticamente. Resultados a Média 1 apresentou maior valor de correlação com o Limiar de Recepção da Fala (rho=0,934; IC=0,901 a 0,958; eqm=52,2). Em relação ao Índice de Reconhecimento da Fala, foi observado que amédia 3 apresentou omaior grau de correlação com o teste(rho= – 0,768; IC= –0,807 a –0,721; eqm = 245) seguido das médias 2 e 4. Conclusão para a população idosa com perda auditiva neurossensorial descendente, o Limiar de Recepção de Fala possui correlação mais forte com a média das frequências 500 Hz, 1000 Hz e 2000 Hz, enquanto o Índice de Reconhecimento de Fala possui maior correlação com as média que incluem as frequências de 3000 Hz e 4000 Hz. .


Purpose to check the correlation between Speech Reception Threshold and Index of Speech Recognition with mean audiometric results. Methods we selected 241elderly patients who underwent examinations of the pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry. As inclusion, audiometry should have a sensorineural hearing loss. The tone thresholds for air obtained were classified according with the following averages: Average 1 – Average of frequencies of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz; Average 2 – Average of frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz; Average 3 – average of frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz; and 4 average – average of frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz. The data were compared with Speech Reception Threshold and Index of Speech Recognition, and treated statistically. Results Average 1 showed higher correlation with the Speech Reception Threshold (rho = 0.934, CI = 0.901 to 0.958; eqm = 52.2). In relation to the Index of Speech Recognition, it was observed that the average 3 showed the highest degree of correlation with the test (rho = – 0.768, CI = –0.807 to –0.721; eqm = 245) followed averages 2 and 4. Conclusion for elderly people with ski slop sensorineural hearing loss, the Speech Reception Threshold has the strongest correlation with the average frequencies 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz, while the Index of Speech Recognition has the highest correlation with the average which include the frequencies 3000 Hz and 4000 Hz. .

2.
Journal of Clinical Neurology ; : 252-258, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-102400

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a low-cost and safe examination for testing the vestibulospinal pathway. Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1)-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) is a slowly progressive disease that affects the vestibulospinal tract early in its course. This study compared the electromyographic (EMG) responses triggered by GVS of asymptomatic HTLV-1-infected subjects and subjects with HAM/TSP. METHODS: Bipolar galvanic stimuli (400 ms and 2 mA) were applied to the mastoid processes of 39 subjects (n=120 stimulations per subject, with 60 from each lower limb). Both the short latency (SL) and medium latency (ML) components of the EMG response were recorded from the soleus muscles of 13 healthy, HTLV-1-negative adults (56+/-5 years, mean+/-SD), and 26 individuals infected with HTLV-1, of whom 13 were asymptomatic (56+/-8 years) and 13 had HAM/TSP (60+/-6 years). RESULTS: The SL and ML EMG components were 55+/-4 and 112+/-10 ms, respectively, in the group of healthy subjects, 61+/-6 and 112+/-10 ms and in the HTLV-1-asymptomatic group, and 67+/-8 and 130+/-3 ms in the HAM/TSP group (p=0.001). The SL component was delayed in 4/13 (31%) of the examinations in the HTLV-1-asymptomatic group, while the ML component was normal in all of them. In the HAM/TSP group, the most common alteration was the absence of waves. CONCLUSIONS: A pattern of abnormal vestibular-evoked EMG responses was found in HTLV-1-neurological disease, ranging from delayed latency among asymptomatic carriers to the absence of a response in HAM/TSP. GVS may contribute to the early diagnosis and monitoring of nontraumatic myelopathies.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Electrophysiology , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 , Mastoid , Muscle Spasticity , Muscles , Paraparesis, Spastic , Spinal Cord Diseases
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL