Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology. 2000; 15 (5): 477-490
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-54693

ABSTRACT

It was already known that Professor Naguib [Bey] Mahfouz [1882-1974] was the first staff anesthetist at Kasr El- Ainy Hospital [KEAH] in Cairo between the years 1904-1906. It is not well established why he changed his specialty. In a pursuit of this story, a very relevant account was discovered in his books published in 1935 on medical education and in 1966, a biography. Interesting revelations in his biography were revealed: First, he was not the first anesthetist at KEAH, and he was appointed to replace a retired anesthetist called Amin Naseem; second, chloroform was introduced to Egypt by Herbert Milton, the British surgeon at KEAH, toward the end of the last century; third, the reason why he changed his specialty was a fatal case of obstructed labor whom he has been giving anesthesia to- an incident that turned him toward obstetrics; fourth, he used chloroform, ehter and spinal analgesia with stovaine even when he was practicing as a surgeon; fifth, he revealed in his medical education book the names of pioneer doctors working in anesthesia in Egypt


Subject(s)
History of Medicine
2.
Annals of Saudi Medicine. 1999; 19 (1): 63-64
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-116548
3.
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology. 1998; 14 (4): 215-218
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-48861

ABSTRACT

An account of the first reported death under chloroform of an 18 years old man, in 1899 at a hospital in Beirut. The local government showed concern and investigated the cause of death. The auther called for awareness of the lethal dangers of chloroform, advised the use of ether and local analgesies


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Chloroform/toxicity , Death
5.
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology. 1998; 14 (6): 407-15
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-48874
6.
Dirasat. 1986; 13 (11): 101-105
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-6902

ABSTRACT

Forty-eight parturient mothers had received epidural analgesia for relief of labour pain. The drugs used were either xylocaine or pethidine [50 mg diluted in 10ml normal saline]. The degrees of pain relief in labour as well as mechanisms of action of the two drugs has been described. It is concluded that epidural pethidine produced pain relief during delivery without instrumentation and that pethidine still can be used whenever local analgesic is not the first choice


Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, Epidural , Meperidine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL