Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-185972

ABSTRACT

Purpose To determine and compare the diagnostic performance of Doppler sonography of fetal umbilical artery (UA) for prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in suspected intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and pre eclampsia. Materials and Methods 100 women with singleton pregnancy between 26 to 30 weeks of gestation were studied in this prospective study over a period of one and half years with color Doppler. UA flow velocity form was studied. In UA systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio, pulsatility index (PI) and Resistance index (RI) were studied. In UA absent diastolic flow or reversed diastolic flow is noted. Results Out of 50 clinically suspected pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) cases, 31 (62%) cases show abnormal PI, 40 (80%) cases show abnormal RI values and 45 (90%) cases show abnormal S/D Ratio's. Sensitivity and specificity of the S/D ratio in predicting PIH are 90% and 88% respectively followed by positive and Negative predictive value (PPV & NPV) of 88% and 89% whereas sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV of RI & PI are lower than S/D ratio. This shows that S/D ratio has more Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictive values. Sensitivity of PI value in predicting fetal outcome is 75%. 22% (11 out of 50 cases) cases show absent/reversal of end diastolic velocities, of these four are reversal of end diastolic velocity (RDEV). All four cases of REDV died before 32 weeks of gestation. Absent diastolic flow is seen in 7 cases, 4 cases died and three cases admitted in NICU with severe respiratory distress. Our study shows absent or reversal of end diastolic velocity is more sensitive in predicting adverse fetal outcome. There was no case of eclampsia or maternal death. Conclusion UA flow velocity waveforms abnormality is more predictive for preeclampsia and IUGR. Hence Doppler is a promising tools in prediction of PIH and IUGR

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-185961

ABSTRACT

The term “acute abdomen” defines a clinical syndrome characterized by the sudden onset of severe abdominal pain requiring emergency medical or surgical treatment. A prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential to minimize morbidity and mortality. The differential diagnosis includes an enormous spectrum of disorders ranging from benign self-limiting diseases to conditions that require emergency surgery. The clinical diagnosis of acute abdomen can be challenging because physical examination clinical presentation and laboratory examination are often non specific and non diagnostic. It is often difficult based on history and physical examination alone to separate these patients from those who require immediate surgery. The increased availability and use of computed tomography (CT) and Ultrasonography (US) have dramatically changed the clinical examination and treatment of patients who present with acute abdominal pain. These noninvasive imaging techniques have effectively replaced exploratory as the primarymeans of examiningpatientswho present with what was formerly known asa surgical abdomen.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL