Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Estud. psicol. (Campinas) ; 32(4): 605-615, Oct.-Dec. 2015. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-764137

ABSTRACT

Este estudo buscou estudar a influência da modalidade de reconto sobre a avaliação da compreensão leitora. Avaliaram-se 34 escolares do 2º ao 5º ano do Ensino Fundamental, sem queixas de leitura, agrupados em: 1) Grupo Reconto Oral: 19 crianças que recontaram oralmente texto narrativo e expositivo lidos; 2) Grupo Reconto Escrito: 15 que o fizeram por escrito. A análise dos recontos quantificou proposições de ideia central, detalhe, inferências e número de enlaces. Estabeleceu-se, também, o padrão de compreensão (3-0, do melhor para o pior desempenho). Resultados evidenciaram semelhanças entre as médias de desempenho dos grupos nas variáveis do reconto de texto narrativo. Para o expositivo, houve diferença para enlaces de primeiro nível (t = -2,114, p = 0,042), com maior média do Grupo reconto escrito. Concluiu-se, portanto, que a modalidade do reconto não influenciou a avaliação da compreensão de textos narrativos, mas o reconto escrito de textos expositivos favoreceu o aparecimento de enlaces entre ideias centrais.


The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the retelling strategy modality on the assessment of reading comprehension. Thirty-four 2nd-5th grade students (elementary school) without reading difficulties were evaluated and grouped as follows: Group 1. Oral retelling: students orally reconstructed narrative and expository texts they read (19 students); Group 2. Writing retelling: students retold these same stories in writing (15 students). The analysis conducted assessed retelling in terms of: proposition of central idea, details, inferences, and number of links. A performance reference standard (3-0) was also established from the best to the worst performance. The results obtained showed similarity between the average performance of the variables of the oral narrative text retelling groups. As for the expository texts, there were differences in the first level of links (t = -2.114, p = 0.042), and the highest average performance was found for the writing retelling group. It can be concluded that the retelling strategy modality did not influence the evaluation of the understanding of narrative texts, but the written retelling of expository texts influenced the connection of central ideas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Comprehension , Reading
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL