Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 3-6, 2009.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-340708

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Weight-and-height-based anthropometric indices have long been used for obesity screening among adolescents.However, the ability of their age-and-sex-specific reference values in classifying adolescent as "obese" in different populations was not fully established. Our study aimed to validate the existing international (BMI-for-age charts from WHO, CDC, IOTF) and local cut-offs [percent weight for height (PWH)] for obesity against body fat percentage, as assessed by 4 skinfolds measurement.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A cross-sectional sample of 6991 adolescents aged 12 to 18 years was measured. All anthropometric measurements were compliant with the internationally accepted protocol. Obesity was defined as percentage body fat greater than or equal to 95 percentile, specific to age and sex. The validity of the existing classification criteria in detecting obesity was evaluated by comparing their respective diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Both prevalence of obesity and diagnostic accuracy indices varied by the classification criteria. While all criteria generated very high specificity rates with the lowest being 95%, their sensitivity rates were low ranging from 43% to 71%. Youden's index suggested that CDC and WHO criteria had optimal sensitivity and specificity. ROC analysis showed that overall performance could be improved by refining the existing cut-offs.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Clinical validity of weight-and-height-based classification systems for obesity screening in Asian adolescents is poorer than expected, and this could be improved by refining the existing cut-offs.</p>


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Anthropometry , Asian People , Body Height , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mass Screening , Obesity , Diagnosis
2.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 57-59, 2009.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-340700

ABSTRACT

There has been a growing concern about obesity worldwide. We performed a review on the prevalence and trends of obesity among adults and children. We reviewed the data on the prevalence of adult obesity and being overweight from the Global Database on Body Mass Index on the World Health Organisation (WHO) Website and prevalence of children being overweight from the International Obesity Task Force website. Various databases were also searched for relevant reviews and these include PubMed, EMBASE, NHS CRD databases and Cochrane. The prevalence of obesity is high in many parts of the world. Generally, there is an increasing trend of prevalence of adult obesity with age. The peak prevalence is reached at around 50 to 60 years old in most developed countries and earlier at around 40 to 50 years old in many developing countries. Obesity is a major health concern. Appropriate strategies need to be adopted to tackle obesity which itself brings about significant disability and premature deaths. Further observation may be needed to see if the trend of prevalence abates or increases in the near future.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Disease Outbreaks , Obesity , Epidemiology , Prevalence , Rural Population , Urban Population
3.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 66-69, 2009.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-340699

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>There has been extensive research on defining the appropriate body mass index (BMI) cut-off point for being overweight and obese in the Asian population since the World Health Organisation (WHO) Expert Consultation Meeting in 2002.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>We reviewed the literature on the optimal BMI cut-off points for Asian populations. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, National Institute for Health Research Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS CRD) Database, Cochrane Library and Google. Attempts to identify further studies were made by examining the reference lists of all retrieved articles. There were 18 articles selected for the review.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 13 studies which have identified the BMI cut-off points for Asian populations lower than the international BMI cut-off points recommended by the WHO. Many of the studies have recommended lowering BMI cut-off point specific for Asian populations. A few studies concurred with the recommended cut-off point for Asian populations recommended by International Association for the Study of Obesity (IASO), the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) and the WHO in 2002. Asian populations were also noted to have higher cardiovascular risk factors than Western populations at any BMI level.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Further research would be needed to look at the all-cause mortality at same BMI levels between Asians and Caucasians in order to evaluate the BMI cut-off recommendations for Asian populations. It is necessary to develop and redefine appropriate BMI cut-off points which are country-specific and ethnic-specific for Asians. These will facilitate the development of appropriate preventive interventions to address the public health problem posed by obesity.</p>


Subject(s)
Humans , Asian People , Body Mass Index , Obesity , Diagnosis , Reference Values
4.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 791-796, 2008.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-244495

ABSTRACT

Mental disorders are both common and costly. The mental health system in Singapore lacks co-ordination as well as being underdeveloped in certain areas. To address these gaps as well to face emerging challenges like an ageing population, and other socioeconomic changes, the Ministry of Health of Singapore has commissioned a Committee to formulate a 5-year Mental Health Policy and Blueprint. A task group has been formed to implement this blueprint and evaluation of these various initiatives with performance measures are inevitable. The choice of these measures, however, can be a daunting task with the various and diverse interests of multiple stakeholders. This paper describes the process of choosing the relevant measures with the appropriate attributes, and suggests a framework, which can serve as a guide for selecting mental health performance measures.


Subject(s)
Humans , Mental Health Services , Reference Standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Methods , Reference Standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Reference Standards , Singapore
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL