ABSTRACT
Introduction: The minimally invasive approach has become the method of choice for treating most benign abdominal diseases that require surgery. However, it is obvious that laparoscopic procedures are not risk free. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of intra abdominal adhesions underneath umbilical scar following laparoscopic sterilization, in patients who are undergoing abdominal surgeries. Materials and Methods:The present study was a hospital based prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Surgery, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College (Dr. RPGMC), Kangra at Tanda (HP). The study group consisted of patients admitted to department of surgery during a period of one year and who fulfilled inclusion criteria. During intraoperative period, they were examined for presence or absence of adhesions at the site of previous laparoscopic sterilization scar at Periumblical area.Results:Total of 60 patients were taken in this study. Two out of 60 (3.3%) patients had adhesions underneath previous Laparoscopic Sterilization scar around umbilicus and adhesive structure was omentum in both cases.Conclusion:Adhesion formation is expected in any abdominal surgery whether open orlaparoscopic surgery. In our study only 3.3% of patients had adhesions underneath previous laparoscopic sterilization scar in periumblical region. Therefore umbilical port can be considered for re-entry of index port in next laparoscopic surgery, in patients with history of laparoscopic surgery through umbilical region.
ABSTRACT
Background and Aims: Baska mask is a newly introduced membranous cuffed supraglottic device whereas I-gel is made up of thermoplastic elastomer, both suitably designed from the anatomical perspective of the airway. Settings and Design: We conducted randomized controlled comparative trial of the Baska mask versus I-gel in a patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Subjects and Methods: A total of 100 adult patients in the age group of 20–70 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups as follows: (1) Baska mask group and (2) I-gel group. The primary outcome was to compare oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of Baska mask and I-gel groups. The secondary outcome was the ease of insertion and removal, number of attempts, insertion time, leak fraction, and laryngopharyngeal morbidity. Statistical Analysis Used: Demographic details were compared using the Chi-square and t-tests. Student's t-test for independent variables was used to compare means of data obtained. Results: Mean OLP was significantly higher in Baska mask group than I-gel group at insertion (29.54 ± 1.41 cm H2O vs. 23.16 ± 3.07 cm H2O, P = 0.02) and 30 min after insertion (33.54 ± 1.16 cm H2O vs. 25.97 ± 2.25 cm H2O, P = 0.001). Insertion time was 12.33 ± 2.61 s with Baska mask and 11.31 ± 1.84 s with I-gel (P = 0.02). Insertion was very easy in 58% of patients in Baska mask and 76% of patients in I-gel (P = 0.03). The leak fraction of Baska mask was significantly less than I-gel (3.56 ± 3.6 vs. 7.16 ± 2.45, P = 0.01). Laryngopharyngeal morbidity was comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: Baska mask is more effective in providing greater OLP compared to I-gel without any increase in laryngopharyngeal morbidity.
ABSTRACT
Background: Burns represent a serious problem around the world especially in low and middle income countries. The aim of this study was to determine epidemiological characteristics, causes and mortality rate of burn deaths in tertiary care hospital of N India as well as to guide future education and prevention programs. Methods: A one year cross-sectional study of all burn patients admitted in Dr. RPGMC Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India was conducted between January 2014-December 2014. Results: Our study revealed that type II (absence of sutural bones) was commoner than type I (presence of type I) asterion. Total of 210 burn injury patients were admitted majority were males[54.5%] and females were [45.5%] males sustained burn injuries mostly at their work place with electric burns whereas females sustained burn injuries at home with cooking appliances. Conclusions: Burn injuries can be reduced by bringing about regulations to develop safer cooking appliances, promoting less inflammable fabrics to be worn out at home and educating the community especially women.