ABSTRACT
Purpose: Herein, we compared the efficacy among the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS), Toddlers Ocular Trauma Score (TOTS), and Pediatric Ocular Trauma Score (POTS) for prognosis prediction in Indian children who had mechanical ocular conditions causing traumatic cataract. Methods: This prospective, interventional study recruited consecutive children undergoing operation for traumatic cataracts caused by mechanical eye injuries at Drashti Netralaya. The following details were obtained from their medical files: the circumstance and time of injuries, penetrating injury type, initial and final visual acuity (VA), time of operation, and associated eye diseases. Specific variables were employed to determine the OTS, TOTS, and POTS. For all patients, the final and predicted VA determined using all scores were compared using Fischer’s exact test. Accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were evaluated for all the scores by using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: We enrolled 124 eyes. Patients’ mean value for age was 4.6 ± 1.29 years; 44 (35.41%) and 74 (64.5%) were female and male patients, respectively. Visual outcomes significantly improved after operation, and the outcomes did not differ between closed? and open?globe injuries (P = 0.162). The actual and predicted VA did not exhibit a statistically significant difference among the three scores. TOTS and POTS were more suitable for evaluating low?risk injuries, whereas the OTS could more efficiently examine high?risk cases. Conclusion: TOTS and POTS were more accurate than the OTS in VA prediction after operation in toddlers with traumatic cataracts caused by mechanical globe injury. TOTS and POTS were more suitable for evaluating low?risk injuries, whereas the OTS could more efficiently examine high?risk cases. All the examined scores can be helpful in estimating VA following treatment
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a genetic disorder associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Presently, well?documented information on this condition is not available in India. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we recruited patients with clinically diagnosed MFS who presented to the outpatient department using revised Ghent nosology. We retrieved complete ophthalmic information, including vision, anterior and posterior segments, exported from electronic medical records, and relevant investigations, surgical details, and follow?up data were obtained in a specific, pretested format. Results: Our cohort consisted of 86 eyes of 43 patients and had a male preponderance. The prevalence was 20.5 per 100,000 individuals. The mean age of the patients was 23.9 years. All eyes were treated either optically with refraction or surgically using lensectomy and vitrectomy with suture supported scleral fixated intraocular lens (IOL), which significantly affected the visual outcome (P = 0.000). Conclusion: Although considered a rare disease, MFS is commonly found in the ophthalmological setting. Refraction and surgery (lensectomy with scleral fixated IOL) may improve the vision significantly