ABSTRACT
Context: The biopsy of cervix can be obtained by various methods with availability of newer modalities like loop elec-trode. Objectives: To compare the histo-pathological parameters and clinical outcome of cervical biopsy obtained using punch biopsy forceps versus loop electrode. Methods: Women attending OPD were screened for cervical pa-thology, and colposcopy was done for those who screened positive. Patients who required cervical biopsy after col-poscopy were allocated into 2 group; one undergoing LEEP biopsy and other half biopsied with Punch forceps. During procedure patients were evaluated for the intra–op pain and bleeding and their severity. The histo-pathological di-agnosis was carried out and the sample was studied for its size, adequacy, and presence of any thermal or crush ar-tefacts. Result: The two methods of biopsy were comparable in intra-op parameters, except for the increased re-quirement for additional haemostasis in LEEP biopsy. There was no case of bleeding from biopsy site at the follow-up visit. LEEP biopsy was associated with continued vaginal discharge more often than punch biopsy. An adequate sam-ple for histopathological diagnosis was obtained in 91.25% of all cases. The comparative findings were reflective of comparable efficacy of both methods in providing an acceptable tissue sample for diagnosis. Conclusion: After ana-lysing and comparing the aforementioned parameters, we opined that neither method can be deemed clearly supe-rior to the other as a cervical biopsy procedure.