ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate(TUPKEP)and transurethral resection of prostate(TURP)on benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods The clinical data of patients with BPH were retrospectively analyzed.The clinical results of 72 cases of TURP and 60 cases of TUPKEP were selected.Results The operation time,the amount of bleeding of the TUPKEP group were (51.3 ±5.9)min,(131.7 ±9.2)mL,which were significantly better than those of the TURP group [(62.5 ± 7.4)min,(174.2 ±10.5)mL](t =9.48,24.48,all P 0.05).Conclusion The clinical efficacy of TUPKEP in the treatment of BPH is positive,it can relieve the symptoms of patients with difficulty in urination,improve the quality of life of patients,and the incidence of postoperative complications is low,it is worthy of clinical application.