Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018; 34 (4): 811-816
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-199093

ABSTRACT

Objective: Many factors affect quality of life [QOL] of dialysis patients. This study was conducted to determine the effect of socio-economic factors effecting QOL of hemodialysis patients


Methods: This descriptive multi-centric, follow up study was conducted at Department of Nephrology, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, from February 2015 to August 2017. All patients who were on regular maintenance hemodialysis [MHD] for more than three months and able to read and understand Urdu version of Kidney Disease Quality Of Life [KDQOL] tool were included in the study. Patients were included from hemodialysis units of Mayo Hospital [MH], Shalamar Hospital [SH], and Shaikh Zayed Hospital [SZH], Lahore. Patients with less than three-month duration on dialysis, with cognitive impairment, dementia, active psychosis, non-Urdu readers/speakers were excluded. Demographic data and lab data was collected on predesigned pro forma. Patients were divided into different groups on the basis of education, monthly income, source of funding for treatment and employment. Patients were followed up for two years to determine the effect of QOL on mortality


Results: One hundred and thirty-five patients were included in the study. Socio-economic factors like education, employment, income, funding was compared with KDQOL sub scales and were found statistically significant [p-value [<0.05]. We found that patients with higher income had better work status [p=0.039] but social [0.04] and sexual function [p=0.029] were relatively better in patients with low income. Employed patients had better work status [p=0.01], ability to do social function [p=0.027] but they had more pain [0.049], symptoms/problems of disease [p=0.05] and effect of kidney disease [p=0.015]. Those patients whose dialysis were funded by their family could socially interact [p=0.012] better and deal more efficiently with effect of kidney disease [p=0.007]. Higher education was associated with better emotional well being [p=0.045], patient satisfaction [p=0.046] and staff encouragement [p=0.045] then patient with lower level of education. QOL had no effect on mortality


Conclusion: The socio-economic factors consisting of education, employment, income and funding are important parameters affecting QOL of kidney patients. QOL does not affect mortality of the dialysis patients

2.
JCPSP-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2016; 26 (8): 651-654
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-183664

ABSTRACT

Objective: to translate, validate and assess the reliability of kidney disease quality of life - short form [KDQOL-SF-36] in Urdu, national language of Pakistan


Study Design: a multicentric descriptive cross-sectional study


Place and Duration of Study: department of Nephrology, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, from February to July 2015


Methodology: patients of end-stage renal disease [ESRD] on maintenance hemodialysis [MHD] for more than three months were included in the study. Patients of ESRD not on dialysis and those with acute renal failure were excluded. The English version of KDQOL-SF-36 was translated in Urdu and then translated back in English; further validation was done by a senior professor of Punjab University, Lahore


Results: one hundred and thirty patients were included in the study. Fifty patients were from Mayo Hospital, 35 from Shalamar Hospital and 50 from Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. The internal consistency reliability coefficient for overall scale was 0.84. Twelve sub-scales [symptoms, effect of kidney disease, and burden of kidney disease, cognitive function, and quality of social interaction, sexual function, social support, physical functioning, role physical, pain, emotional wellbeing and role emotional] had more than 0.70 internal consistency reliability coefficients. Overall mean score of the domains i.e kidney disease component score [KDCS], physical component score [PCS], and mental component score [MCS] was 60.62 +/-17.61, 43.12 +/-19.54, and 49.27 +/-14.52, respectively. A significant positive relationship was observed between KDCS and MCS domains, KDCS and PCS domains, PCS, and MCS domains


Conclusion: the Urdu version of KDQOL-SF-36 is a reliable and valid version to measure QOL in kidney disease patients on dialysis in Pakistan

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL