Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Asia Pacific Allergy ; (4): e16-2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-750139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) has been reported to have caused severe bronchial asthma attacks and hospitalization epidemics in Japan in September 2015. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of β2-agonist inhalation in a pediatric emergency center during a period of increased hospitalization for bronchial asthma, which was suggested to be associated with EV-D68. METHODS: We investigated the prevalence of β2-agonist inhalation in a pediatric emergency center in Saga city, Japan, from April 2013 to October 2015, and also clarified the trends in bronchial asthma hospitalization in the same area during that time. RESULTS: The prevalence of β2-agonist inhalation in the pediatric emergency center, September 2015 was highest when EV-D68 became widespread. The monthly average for β2-agonist inhalation during the study period was 91 cases, but the count in September 2015 was 255 cases. Hospitalized cases of bronchial asthma in September 2015 were increased for age ≥3 years and not increased for age <3 years, but the prevalence of β2-agonist inhalation at the pediatric emergency center was increased even under the age of 3 years. CONCLUSION: During the epidemic period for EV-D68, cases requiring β2-agonist inhalation were increased. The EV-D68 epidemic may be related to not only severe cases requiring hospitalization, but also exacerbation of relatively mild symptoms of bronchial asthma.


Subject(s)
Humans , Asthma , Emergencies , Enterovirus , Hospitalization , Inhalation , Japan , Outpatients , Prevalence
2.
Asia Pacific Allergy ; (4): 37-41, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-750088

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In view of the increasing prevalence of food allergies, there has been an associated increase in frequency of situations requiring an emergency response for anaphylaxis at the home, childcare facilities and educational institutions. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the situation of adrenaline auto-injector administration in nursery/kindergarten/school, we carried out a questionnaire survey on pediatric physicians in Western Japan. METHODS: In 2015, self-reported questionnaires were mailed to 421 physicians who are members of the West Japan Research Society Pediatric Clinical Allergy and Shikoku Research Society Pediatric Clinical Allergy. RESULTS: The response rate was 44% (185 physicians) where 160 physicians had a prescription registration for the adrenaline auto-injector. In the past year, 1,330 patients were prescribed the adrenaline auto-injector where 83 patients (6% of the prescribed patients) actually administered the adrenaline auto-injector, of which 14 patients (17% of the administered patients) self-administered the adrenaline auto-injector. “Guardians” at the nursery/kindergarten and elementary school were found to have administered the adrenaline auto-injector the most. Among 117 adrenaline auto-injector prescription-registered physicians, 79% had experienced nonadministration of adrenaline auto-injector at nursery/kindergarten/school when anaphylaxis has occurred. The most frequent reason cited for not administering the adrenaline auto-injector was “hesitation about the timing of administration.” CONCLUSION: If the adrenaline auto-injector was administered after the guardian arrived at the nursery/kindergarten/school, it may lead to delayed treatment of anaphylaxis in which symptoms develop in minutes. Education and cooperation among physicians and nursery/kindergarten/school staff will reduce the number of children suffering unfortunate outcomes due to anaphylaxis.


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Anaphylaxis , Education , Emergencies , Epinephrine , Food Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity , Japan , Nurseries, Infant , Postal Service , Prescriptions , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL