ABSTRACT
Current evidence for the usefulness of prophylactic antiemetic drugs in opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) in cancer patients receiving opioid analgesics is limited. Further, antiemetic prophylaxis is not considered necessary in the Guideline for Cancer Pain Management by the Japanese Society of Palliative Medicine. However, prevention of side effects such as OINV is important when opioid analgesics are administered for adequate pain management and to maintain adherence. Cancer patients expect us to study factors affecting OINV and effective prophylactic measures for the condition. We retrospectively analyzed electronic records in our hospital. We found that female sex and the use of prophylactic antiemetics, chemotherapeutic agents, and steroids were statistically significant factors associated with opioid-induced nausea, and that female sex and radiation therapy were significant factors associated with opioid-induced vomiting. Especially in females, the frequency of nausea was significantly reduced in the group that received chemotherapy with antiemetics on the same day of receiving opioid analgesics, compared to the groups that did not receive chemotherapy, or that did not receive antiemetics but received chemotherapy. These results suggest that, especially in females, administering chemotherapy along with antiemetics on the same day may be one possible prophylactic measure for OINV.
ABSTRACT
In this study, we implemented a health education course, comprising lectures, cooking lessons, and group discussions for household cooks, that addressed the need for continued reduction of table salt intake and evaluated the effects from participants’ narratives. After the health education course, participants reported continuing to make the following efforts: planning dishes that have a milder yet still delicious taste, evaluating the amount of salt, refraining from highly salty dishes, and continuing to reduce salt use when cooking. The reasons participants continued to reduce table salt use included wanting to live a healthy life, understanding how to reduce salt in dishes, learning to reduce salt consumption, learning to check the amount of salt in dishes, learning that low-salt cooking is easy, learning that unseasoned dishes can be delicious, and feeling the benefits of reduced salt intake. Participants learned that low-salt cooking is easy and how to determine the amount of salt from set values, which were effective for their continued reduction of salt intake. Moreover, our study shows that continuous support is important until individuals become accustomed to milder tastes.
ABSTRACT
<b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous patient education on pain control in outpatients based on changes in pain intensity scores and occurrence of opioid-related adverse effects. <b>Methods:</b> The education intervention was conducted in the following phases; 1) interview at the first visit for opioid introduction, 2) telephone follow-up at home 3 to 7 days after introducing opioid analgesics, and 3) interview at the next visit. Pain intensity scores; frequency of rescue dose; and occurrence of adverse opioid-related effects such as constipation, nausea, and drowsiness were compared among the three intervention phases. <b>Results:</b> When comparing data at phase 2 and 3 with those at phase 1, daily maximum pain score decreased significantly, frequency of rescue dose and opioid dosage increased significantly, and occurrence rates of constipation decreased. <b>Conclusion:</b> Continuous patient education by pharmacist intervention based on not only patient visit interviews but also telephone communication on non-visiting days can improve the pain intensity scores and reduce the rate of opioid-related adverse effects for cancer outpatients.