ABSTRACT
A total of 495 Campylobacterjejuni and 122 C. coli isolated from Thai children were screened for macrolide (erythromycin and azithromycin) resistance by disk diffusion assay. Minimum inhibitory concentrations for erythromycin, azithromycin, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, streptomycin, gentamicin and chloramphenicol were further determined for these macrolide-resistant Campylobacter isolates. Presence of known point mutations resulting in reduced susceptibility to macrolides was investigated by PCR and DNA sequencing. Seventeen percent (23/122) of C. coli and 2.4% (12/495) of C. jejuni isolates were resistant to macrolides. By sequencing domain V of the 23S ribosomal DNA from all 35 macrolide-resistant isolates, a known point mutation of 23S rRNA associated with reduced susceptibility to macrolides was detected in all isolates except one. Among the macrolide-resistant isolates, all were multiply resistant to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin, of which the latter is the preferred antimicrobial used for diarrheal treatment in Thailand. Furthermore, most macrolide-resistant isolates were also resistant to tetracycline and streptomycin. The spread of macrolide and quinolone resistant Campylobacter should be monitored closely in Thailand and elsewhere as these antimicrobials are preferred drugs for treatment of diarrhea.
Subject(s)
Campylobacter coli/drug effects , Campylobacter jejuni/drug effects , Child , Drug Resistance, Multiple/drug effects , Humans , Macrolides/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , ThailandABSTRACT
This study aimed to detect Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp infection from stool specimens. A total of 345 stool specimens were examined by microscopy (both direct smear and formalin concentration) and EIA techniques (ProSpecT Microplate Assay) for G. lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp. Of 73 tests positive for G. lamblia, 41(56.2%) were positive by microscopy, and 71(97.3%) were positive by EIA. Of 16 tests positive for Cryptosporidium spp, 5 (31.3%) were positive by microscopy, and 16(100%) were positive by EIA technique. The results demonstrate that this EIA method is quick, simple, and more sensitive than the microscopy method and should be used for the detection of G. lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp where the prevalence of these protozoan parasites is a public health problem.
Subject(s)
Animals , Cryptosporidiosis/diagnosis , Cryptosporidium/isolation & purification , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Feces/parasitology , Giardia lamblia/isolation & purification , Giardiasis/diagnosis , Humans , Microscopy , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Three hundred thirty-six stool samples from October 2001 through October 2002 were analyzed for the presence of intestinal parasites. Fifty-six of these (16.7%) were positive for a total of 66 parasites; 65/66 (98.5%) were detected by iodine and dimethyl sulfoxide-modified acid-fast (DMSO-mAFB) stained smears of fresh and formalin-ethylacetate sedimentation concentrated samples. Saline, iodine, and DMSO-mAFB stained smears of fresh stool samples alone detected significantly fewer parasites, finding only 50/66 (75.8%) (p < 0.05). Stool samples analyzed by trichrome stained specimens preserved in Zinc sulfate polyvinyl alcohol (Zinc PVA) detected only 41/ 66 (62.2%) of the parasites. In our study population, it was necessary to perform the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS) recommended to accurately detect intestinal parasites. The concentration technique is simple and significantly increased the detection of intestinal parasites.