Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
PAFMJ-Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2010; 60 (3): 500-502
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-139492
2.
PAFMJ-Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2010; 60 (1): 63-68
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-99172

ABSTRACT

Objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of instrumented spinal fusion in selected patients with Chronic Low Back Pain [CLBP] in our setup. Quasi-experimental study. Spine Unit, Orthopaedic Department, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Jan 2002 to Dec 2007. Consecutive first one hundred patients were selected from spine unit database that underwent instrumented spinal fusion for chronic low back pain lasting more than one year, due to degenerative disease of spine. Average age was 42 years. There were 62 males and 38 females. Diagnosis included; spinal stenosis [26%], failed disc surgery [22%], spondylolisthesis [19%], degenerative disc disease [17%], and instability [16%]. Operations performed; Pedicle Screw Fixation [PSF] with Postero-lateral Fusion [PLF] in 3% patients. Trans Laminar Facet Screw [TLFS] with PLF in 24% patients. Anterior Lumbar Inter-body Fusion [ALIF] in 9% patients. Posterior Lumbar Inter-body Fusion [PLIF] in 40% patients and Trans-foraminal Lumbar Inter-body Fusion [TLIF] in 24% patients. Average follow up was for 30 months. 86% patients had full spinal fusion. 71% patients were fully satisfied with treatment, 28% were partially satisfied. Post-operatively, on average, visual analogue scale [VAS] showed 48 points significant improvement and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] showed 53 points significant improvement. Instrumented Spinal Fusion is effective in our set up for relieving symptoms and improving functional outcome in selected patients with debilitating Chronic Low Back Pain due to degenerative disease of spine. Single fusion technique is not ideal for all types of patients and surgeon has to be versatile and trained in using different fusion techniques as the situation demands


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Low Back Pain/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Pain Measurement
3.
PAFMJ-Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2005; 56 (4): 382-389
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-128164

ABSTRACT

Objective of present paper is to document the operations performed in earthquake spinal injury patients and to analyze the results of surgery. This is a quasi-experimental study. This study was conducted at the department of Orthopaedic and Spinal surgery at Combined Military Hospital [CMH], Rawalpindi. Study started after earthquake in Pakistan on 8[th] of October 2005 and ended in August 2006. 250 patients with spinal injury were admitted at the three main army hospitals at Rawalpindi [CMH, MH and AFIRM] after earthquake on 8[th] October 2005. Out of these, 110 patients underwent 120 major spinal operations. 12 patients were received from other units for revision surgery. 75% of the patients were civilians and 25% were army personnel and their families. Average age was 28 years and range was 8-65 years. 56% patients were females and 44% were males. 46% patients had complete neurological deficit and 54% had incomplete neurological deficit. Most common associated injuries were fractures of tibia and fibula. Most common level of injury was at T12/L1 [55%]. After surgery almost all patients had rehabilitation at AFIRM. Post-operatively excellent [>75%] or good [50-75%] correction of deformity was achieved in 90% of patients. 92% patients had mild or no pain, post-operatively. Neurological improvement was seen in all patients with incomplete deficit except four. Some patients with complete deficit also showed improvement. Overall there was 1.5 AIS improvement per patient. At last follow up 46% patients were walking independently and 51% were independent in wheel chair. Spinal surgery in patients with unstable spines after major disaster should be carried out by properly trained surgeons as soon as possible and in a setup where facilities for proper rehabilitation are available as it carries best prognosis for these high risk and at times paralyzed patients

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL