ABSTRACT
Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) has been used as an indicator of inspiratory muscle strength. Nevertheless their values show a high variability (~20%). The aim of this study was to determine the MIP, according to three protocols in young subjects. An observational cross-sectional study was carried out on a convenience sample of 60 students, 30 men (19.2 ± 0.81 years-old) and 30 women (19.17 ± 0.91 years-old). MIP was evaluated according to the protocol defined for each group of 20 participants of both genders: Group 1: American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS); Group 2: Learning; Group 3: Warming. For the analysis we used descriptive and inferential statistics, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. No differences in MIP were found for the three best averages between groups (p = 0.078). When comparing the total performance of MIP replicates G3 was higher than G1 and G2 (p <0.0001). The coefficient of variation was higher in G2. It is concluded that the warming protocol (G3) could mitigate the effect of learning.
La presión inspiratoria máxima (PIM) ha sido utilizada como indicador de fuerza de la musculatura inspiratoria. No obstante sus valores presentan gran variabilidad (~20%). El objetivo del estudio fue determinar la PIM, según tres protocolos en sujetos jóvenes. Se realizó un estudio observacional de corte transversal en una muestra por conveniencia de 60 estudiantes, 30 hombres (19,2 ± 0,81 años) y 30 mujeres (19,17 ± 0,91 años). Se evaluó la PIM según el protocolo definido para cada grupo compuesto por 20 participantes de ambos géneros: Grupo 1: American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS); Grupo 2: Aprendizaje; Grupo 3: Calentamiento. Para el análisis se utilizó estadística descriptiva, e inferencial considerándose significativo un valor de p < 0,05. No se encontraron diferencias de PIM de los tres mejores promedios entre grupos (p = 0,078). Al comparar el desempeño total de las repeticiones de PIMG3 fue más alto que G1 y G2 (p < 0,0001). El coeficiente de variación fue más alto en G2. Se concluye que el protocolo calentamiento (G3) podría atenuar el efecto de aprendizaje.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Inhalation/physiology , Maximal Respiratory Pressures , Muscle Strength/physiology , Respiratory Muscles/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , StudentsABSTRACT
Background: The six minute walk test (6MWT) is an important physical performance measure used in older people. Aim: To assess the total distance walked and the physiological cost of the 6MWT in non-disabled older people. Material and Methods: Fifty six females aged 69 ± 5 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 31 ± 4 kg/m² and sixteen males aged 70 ± 7 years with a BIM of 29 ± 4 kg/m² underwent a 6MWT. The total distance walked was registered and the physiological cost (PC) of the test was calculated as the ratio between the difference of heart rate at work and at rest and the walking speed. The socioeconomic status (SES) of participants was determined using a questionnaire designed in Chile. Results: Among participants of middle-lower and middle-upper SES, the PC was 0.43 ± 0.1 and 0.44 ± 0.09 beats/min, respectively, p = NS. Males of middle-upper SES had a significantly higher PC than their middle-lower SES counterparts. The total distance walked was 493 ± 58 and 501 ± 63 m among participants of upper and lower SES. The plateau in reserve heart rate appeared earlier among participants of upper SES of both genders. Conclusions: Older participants of middle-upper SES had a higher physiological efficiency during the execution of the 6MWT.