Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-207359

ABSTRACT

Background: Lymphadenectomy in epithelial ovarian cancers has remained a controversial subject. Lack of robust evidence on survival benefits and surgical morbidity associated questions its role in the era of adjuvant chemotherapy. The present study assessed pelvic and para-aortic lymph node removal in epithelial ovarian cancer in Indian women and tried to find clinicopathological correlation of nodal involvement and postoperative implications of lymphadenectomy.Methods: Thirty patients with diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer posted for primary debulking surgery were recruited and underwent staging laparotomy along with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Nodal involvement was confirmed on histopathology and various parameters which could predict nodal metastasis were assessed. Patients were followed up for 12 months post-surgery.Results: Nodal yield was ten for pelvic and four for paraaortic nodes. Pelvic node involvement was seen in 26.6% (8/30) of the patients and para-aortic in 15% (3/20) of the patients. Serous histology, higher grade, stage 3 and above, positive peritoneal cytology, omental involvement showed a higher lymph node involvement though not statistically significant. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was associated with increased operating time, blood loss and longer hospital stay.Conclusions: Lymphadenectomy increases morbidity and decision should be based on predictors of nodal involvement.

2.
Indian J Hum Genet ; 2012 Jan; 18(1): 75-82
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139447

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis of antenatally detected renal anomalies by sonographic evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a follow-up study of all antenatally detected renal anomalies from January 2008 to Dec 2009 referred to fetal medicine clinic. Prenatal evaluation was done and cases were divided into four groups depending upon their prenatal sonographic findings. Post natal follow-up was done up to one year in cases of live babies. Autopsy was carried out in still born fetus after consent. RESULTS: The renal anomaly was detected in 55 cases, which were fully followed. The prognosis was said to be poor for group I cases with gross extra renal anomaly along with the renal anomaly, and for group II in which there was organic renal pathology with loss of renal function suggested by non-visualization of bladder and almost absent liquor. Prognosis was guarded and depended upon the gestational age of presentation in group III, which had obstructive uropathy; prognosis was good in group IV cases, which were mild, unilateral or which presented late. CONCLUSION: Prenatal sonographic evaluation gives reasonably accurate picture of the prognosis and can be very helpful in counseling the parents regarding prognosis and help in deciding the timing and route of delivery.


Subject(s)
Adult , Autopsy , Female , Fetus , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Kidney/abnormalities , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Postnatal Care , Pregnancy Outcome/etiology , Prognosis , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/statistics & numerical data
3.
Indian J Med Sci ; 2011 Dec; 65(12) 535-542
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-147807

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aims of the study were to find out the maternal and perinatal outcome of early onset severe preeclampsia (PE) in a tertiary care center in a developing country like India and to determine whether expectant management in such a setup improves the perinatal outcome. Materials and Methods: It was a retrospective study. All women with early PE were admitted stabilized and evaluated. Expectant management was given whenever there was no indication for eminent delivery. The perinatal outcome of the expectant group was compared with that of the aggressive group, and appropriate statistical analysis was carried out. Results: A total of 106 women were admitted with severe PE, 61 were treated aggressively, and 45 were stable enough to receive expectant management. The total days gained on expectant management was 7 days. Perinatal mortality was 31.13%. Perinatal outcome of the expectant and aggressive management groups did not differ (P = 0.141); there was no increase in maternal complications on expectant management. There were 2 cases of maternal mortality in the aggressively managed group. Conclusion: Perinatal mortality in severe PE is high. There was no increase in maternal morbidity on expectant management; however, there was no difference in perinatal mortality on expectant management.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL