Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ; : e54-2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-61169

ABSTRACT

There has been significant progress in the understanding of the pathology and molecular biology of rare ovarian cancers, which has helped both diagnosis and treatment. This paper provides an update on recent advances in the knowledge and treatment of rare ovarian cancers and identifies gaps that need to be addressed by further clinical research. The topics covered include: low-grade serous, mucinous, and clear cell carcinomas of the ovary. Given the molecular heterogeneity and the histopathological rarity of these ovarian cancers, the importance of designing adequately powered trials or finding statistically innovative ways to approach the treatment of these rare tumors has been emphasized. This paper is based on the Rare Ovarian Tumors Conference for Young Investigators which was presented in Tokyo 2015 prior to the 5th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG).


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Consensus , Diagnosis , Molecular Biology , Mucins , Ovarian Neoplasms , Ovary , Pathology , Population Characteristics , Rare Diseases , Research Personnel
2.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 717-721, 2002.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-160897

ABSTRACT

It is often difficult to conclude that improvements in survival with time are due to a screening programme alone. Although a reduction in the death rate from a given cancer may reflect the benefits of early detection or improved treatment, the benefits may also result from lead time bias and over-diagnosis, the former resulting in longer survival of screen-identified cancers because the time before the cancer would have been clinically diagnosed is included in calculations. Furthermore, recent reviews on randomised clinical trials of cancer screening have provided strong evidence that misclassifications in causes of death have been a major problem, leading to an over-estimation of the effectiveness (or alternatively an under-estimation of potential harm) of screening.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Incidence , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL