ABSTRACT
@#Transurethral incision of ureterocele (TUI-U) is a simple, quick, less invasive, and less expensive,and an effective procedure for the management of ureteroceles. Several studies have already shownits utility for primary management of ureteroceles but it has also been associated with the need foradditional surgery. The authors reviewed charts of patients from their database to describe the outcomesof TUI-U done in ureteroceles associated with the upper pole moiety of a duplex system. They alsolooked into preoperative patient characteristics and post TUI-U outcomes that could influence theneed for subsequent surgeries.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#The authors identified patients from their duplex system database who presentedwith a ureterocele and underwent TUI-U. They reviewed the patient records of 25 patients who wereincluded in the study to determine the outcomes of TUI-U in duplex system ureteroceles. Chi squareand Mann Whitney U tests were used to determine whether preoperative patient features and postTUI-U outcomes were associated with secondary surgery.@*RESULTS@#Out of 65 patients who had duplex system ureteroceles, 25 patients (38.4%) underwent TUI-U at a mean age of 1.51 years old. TUI-U alone was successful in improving the prevalent signs andsymptoms of 15 patients (60%) in this group, while 10 patients (40%) had to undergo subsequentsurgical procedures. Breakthrough urinary tract infection (UTI) post TUI-U was the only patientfactor noted to be significantly associated with a secondary surgery for duplex system ureterocele(p=0.027).@*CONCLUSION@#TUI-U as primary treatment for duplex system ureteroceles is not yet widely accepteddue to reported rates of morbidities and need for secondary surgery. Present data however show thatTUI-U can be used as a primary procedure and even as a definitive procedure for this subset ofpatients with remarkable results in terms of symptoms resolution and improvement of upper tract profiles.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#The detection rate of the current standard systematic 12 core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)guided prostate biopsy remains low despite numerous modifications of the technique. This non-randomized experimental study evaluated the accuracy of standard TRUS-guided systematic prostatebiopsy as performed by selected urologists in obtaining samples representative of the peripheral zoneof the prostate, by analyzing virtual biopsies performed on a prostate phantom model.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#Thirty (30) urologists (26 consultants and 4 senior residents) were invited toperform two consecutive simulation TRUS guided 12-core biopsies on a phantom prostate model.The task was to hit twelve equal sized spherical targets which would correspond to the lateral andextreme lateral areas of the base, mid gland and apex of the peripheral zone of the phantom prostate,which would represent the usual biopsy technique. Degree of agreement (kappa) was computed.Eight (8) operators had below satisfactory kappa values and were excluded from the succeedinganalysis. Accuracy was calculated by dividing the number of accurately hit targets by the number ofvirtual cores (12). Data were encoded in MS Excel and Stata MP v.14 was used for data analysis.@*RESULTS@#Overall, the mean accuracy was 63.17% and median accuracy was 60% (95% CI: 49.2-65.15)for the 22 operators included in the study. The lateral regions, particularly the midgland (95.8%-100% accuracy) were the most frequently biopsied areas and were often resampled. The targets at theprostatic base were missed by most operators (36.05% accuracy).@*CONCLUSION@#Systematic TRUS guided prostate biopsy, in the manner that it is performed, has itsinherent flaws, compounded by limitations in imaging capability and intra-operator variabilityresulting in low accuracy rates. A shift to newer prostate biopsy technique and methodologies withsignificantly higher accuracy rates is recommended.