¿Ha disminuido la colectomía por crisis de colitis ulcerosa?

Background: Treatment for moderate-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) includes steroids, biologic therapy and total colectomy. Aim: To describe the features of patients with moderate to severe active UC, their hospital evolution and need for colectomy. Material and Methods: Non-concurrent cohort study of all patients admitted to our institution with a diagnosis of moderate or severe UC crisis between January 2008 and May 2019. Truelove Witts (TW) criteria were used to categorize disease severity. Twelve-month colectomy-free survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: One hundred-twenty patients aged 16 to 89 (median 35) years had 160 admissions for acute moderate to severe UC. Median admission per patient was 1 (1-3), and median hospital stay was six days (1-49). Cytomegalovirus and Clostridioides difficile were found in 17.5 and 14.2% of crises, respectively. Corticosteroids were used in all crises and biologic therapy in 6.9% of them. Emergency or elective colectomies were performed in 18.3 and 6.7% of patients, respectively. The need for emergency total colectomy decreased from 24.6 to 7.8% (Risk ratio 3.16, p < 0.01) between de first and second half of the study period. Kaplan-Meier analysis for long term colectomy-free survival in both periods confirmed this decrease (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Medical treatment for moderate to severe UC crises had a 86.3% success and a small percentage required emergency total colectomy. Emergency surgery decreased in the last decade.

Diagnóstico y manejo de colitis ulcerosa grave: una mirada actualizada / Management of severe ulcerative colitis: an up-to-date

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the colon, with alternating periods of remission and activity. Exacerbations can be severe and associated with complications and mortality. Diagnosis of severe UC is based on clinical, biochemical and endoscopic variables. Patients with severe UC must be hospitalized. First line therapy is the use of intravenous corticoids which achieve clinical remission in most patients. However, 25% of patients will be refractory to corticoids, situation that should be evaluated at the third day of therapy. In patients without response, cytomegalovirus infection must be quickly ruled out to escalate to second line therapy with biological drugs or cyclosporine. Total colectomy must not be delayed if there is no response to second line therapy, if there is a contraindication for second line therapies or there are complications such as: megacolon, perforation or massive bleeding. An active management with quick escalation on therapy allows to decrease the prolonged exposure to corticoids, reduce colectomy rates and its perioperative complications.

Resultados inmediatos y alejados del reservorio ileal con anastomosis reservorio-anal practicado en forma simultánea o diferida con la proctocolectomía en pacientes portadores de colitis ulcerosa / Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed simultaneously or delayed with the proctocolectomy: short and long-term results in patients with ulcerative colitis

Objetivo: Analizar las diferencias en los resultados quirúrgicos entre 2 grupos en colitis ulcerosa: proctocolectomía, reservorio ileal y anastomosis reservorio-anal (RIARA), simultáneo con la proctocolectomía (grupo 1) o diferido (grupo 2). Material y método: Estudio retrospectivo en 126 pacientes sometidos a RIARA. En todos los pacientes se confeccionó un RIARA en «J¼, excepto en 4 que se hizo en «S¼. Todos fueron protegidos con ileostomía. Complicaciones Clavien-Dindo II-V fueron registradas. Resultados: Pacientes con una mediana de edad de 37 años (12-61), 72 eran de género femenino (57%). Se practicó proctocolectomía y RIARA en 24 pacientes (19%) y proctectomía y RIARA en 102 (81%). Se observaron complicaciones postoperatorias en 19 pacientes (13%). Infección de la herida y sepsis pelviana, en 4% respectivamente, fueron las más frecuentes. Tres pacientes fueron reintervenidos: 2 por hemoperitoneo y uno por necrosis isquémica del reservorio. No hubo mortalidad postoperatoria. No se observó diferencia significativa en la morbilidad postoperatoria entre los grupos. Se observaron complicaciones a largo plazo en 48 pacientes (38%): obstrucción intestinal en 18 pacientes (14%), fístula reservorio-vaginal (FRV) en 9 (12,5%), y reservoritis crónica en 8 (6,9%) fueron las más frecuentes. Al comparar los 2 grupos, se observó mayor frecuencia de FRV en el grupo 1 (p = 0,02). Conclusión: En este estudio no se demostró diferencia en la morbilidad postoperatoria entre el grupo 1 y 2. En los resultados alejados hubo mayor frecuencia significativa de FRV en el grupo 1.

Aim: To compare the surgical results of both groups: Simultaneous with the proctocolectomy (SRP) (group 1) or delayed after colectomy (DRP) (group 2). Material and methods: Retrospective study on 126 patients submitted to RP. All patients had a J-pouch, except 4 S. All of them protected with a loop ileostomy. The median time between colectomy and IPAA was 5 months (4-6 range). Clavien-Dindo II-V complications were registered. Results: 126 patients had IPAA. Age median 37 years (12-61 range); 72 (57%) women. SRP in 24 (19%) and DRP was performed in 102 (81%). Postoperative complications were recorded in 19 patients (13%). Wound infection and pelvic sepsis were observed in 4% each. Three patients needed early reoperation: two for hemoperitoneum and one for ischemic necrosis of the pouch. There was no post-operative mortality. No significant difference in 30 days postoperative complication rate was found between SRP and DRP. On long-term follow-up: Intestinal obstruction in 18 patients (14%), pouch-vaginal fistula (PVF) in 9 (12.5%) and chronic pouchitis in 8 (6.9%) were the most common complications. PVF was significantly more frequent on group 1. Conclusion: In this series, no significant difference was found in the early surgical results between group 1 and 2. In the long term, PVF was significantly more common in group 1.

Un índice neutrófilo/linfocito elevado se asocia a peor pronóstico en cancer de colon etapa II resecado / An elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor prognosis in stage II resected colon cancer

Background: The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is an effective marker of inflammation ana can have prognostic value in surgical patients. Aim: To evaluate the effect of an increased neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on perioperative complications ana overall ana disease-free survival in patients undergoing elective resection for stage II colon cancer. Material and Methods: Data was obtained from clinical charts, preoperative blood results and hospital records of all patients undergoing an elective curative resection for colon cancer, between 2000 and 2007. Preoperative NLR was calculated. Follow-up was obtained from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database, clinical records and questionnaires. Uni and multivariable analysis were performed to identify associations, and survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: One hundred twenty two patients with a mean age of69years (52% males), were evaluated. Median follow-up was 73 months, and overall survival for 1 and 5years was 95% and 68%, respectively. On a multivariable analysis after adjusting for age, sex, tumor depth invasion, use of adjuvant therapies and American Society of Anesthesiology preoperative risk score, an NLR > 5 was associated with an increased perioperative complication rate (odds ratio: 3,06, p = 0,033). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a worse overall and disease-free survival for patients with NLR greater than five. Conclusions: A preoperative NLR of five or more is associated with greater perioperative morbidity and worse oncological outcomes in patients undergoing resection for elective stage II colon cancer.