Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Rectal Resection in Rectal Cancer: Does Laparoscopic Rectal Resection Increase Anastomotic Leakage Rate?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: From March 2001 and February 2006 in Seoul Veterans' Hospital, the prospective laparoscopic colorectal resection database identified 101 patients who a had laparoscopic rectal resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The associations between clinical anastomotic leakage and patient-, tumor-, surgery- and laparoscopic-related variables were studied. RESULTS: The rate of clinical anastomotic leakage was 4 percent (4 of 101). The patient-related variable significantly associated with clinical anastomotic leakage was preoperative radiotherapy. The surgery-related factor that turned out to be significant was anastomosis situated less than 5 cm from the anal verge. No tumor- or laparoscopic-related variables were significantly associated with clinical anastomotic leakage. CONSLUSIONS: A protective ileostomy should be considered after a laparoscopic rectal resection for an rectal cancer for anastomosis situated less than 5 cm from the anal verge, particularly when preoperative radiotherapy is being used.

Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Aged Patients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the periopertive morbidity and mortality rates in relation to the principal variables in aged patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal resection. METHODS: From March 2001 to March 2006, the prospective laparoscopic colorectal resection database was used to identify 233 patients. Among them, 132 were 70 years of age or older and they were classified as the aged group. 101 were younger than 70 years of age and they were classified as the younger group. RESULTS: Comorbidity was more common in the aged group than in the younger group (67.4% and 53.5%, respectively) (P=0.030). There were higher ASA scores in the aged group (I: 2.3% II: 68.2% III: 29.5%) than in the younger group (I: 27.7% II: 56.4% III: 15.8%) (P<0.0001). There was a higher postoperative complication rate for the aged group than for the younger group (25.0% and 8.9%, respectively) (P=0.002). Only one case of mortality (0.8%) was found in the aged group. The period of the postoperative hospital stay was longer for the aged group than that for the younger group (21.9+/-3/416.3 days and 16.3+/-3/48.1days, respectively) (P= 0.002). For the aged group, univariate analysis revealed that the operative procedure, disease, the T stage and the operation time were significant variables for the postoperative complications, and multivariate analysis identified the operation time as an independent variable faor the postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: More prudent care is needed to prevent postoperative complications for the aged patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal resection, and particularly for those who can be expected to have a longer operation time.