ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the instant effects and five-year clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease patients complicated with diabetes mellitus after StentBoost-optimized percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods From March 2009 to July 2010, 184 patients undergoing PCI at our hospital were found stent underexpansion or malapposition by StentBoost after stents implantation and were divided into the diabetic (=73, 39.67%) and the non-diabetic group (=111, 60.33%). All patients received StentBoost-guided post-dilatation after stent implantation. The instant procedural results were measured and clinical outcome after five-year follow-up was analyzed in each group. Between-group comparisons were performed using Chi-square test or Student's test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to reveal the independent predictors for long-term clinical outcomes of StentBoost-optimized PCI . Results After StentBoost-guided post-dilatation, the minimum diameter (MinLD), maximum diameter (MaxLD) and average diameter in both groups increased significantly than before (<0.001), the (MaxLD-MinLD)/MaxLD ratio and the in-stent residual stenosis decreased accordingly (<0.001). The five-year follow-up showed similar mortality rate (4.92% . 2.86%, =0.67) and major adverse cardiac event rate (11.48% . 11.43%, = 1.0) between the diabetic and the non-diabetic group, whereas the recurrence of angina pectoris was higher in the diabetic group compared to the non-diabetic group (47.54% . 29.52%; =0.02). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age and left ventricular ejection fraction rather than diabetes mellitus were independent predictors for long-term clinical outcomes. Conclusions StentBoost could effectively improve instant PCI results; the long-term clinical outcomes of StentBoost-optimized PCI were similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Age and left ventricular ejection fraction were the independent predictors for long-term clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To analyze the relationship between lung ultrasound B line and NT-proBNP, E/e' in order to explore the accuracy of B lines for diagnosing pulmonary edema in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Methods: A total of 124 AHF patients admitted in out hospital from 2016-02 to 2017-02 were enrolled. According to the number of B line, patients were divided into 3 groups: Mild pulmonary edema group, patients with B line<15, Moderate pulmonary edema group, 15≤B line<30 and Severe pulmonary edema group, B line≥30. Basic clinical condition and echocardiography parameters were compared among 3 groups; relationships between B line and NT-proBNP, E/e', EF, pulmonary artery pressure were analyzed respectively; the sensitivity and specificity for B-line diagnosing NT-proBNP≥5000 pg/ml and E/e'≥14 were evaluated by ROC curve analysis. Results: Compared with Mild and Moderate pulmonary edema groups, Severe pulmonary edema group had the severer NYHA grade, more wet rale, higher NT-proBNP level and more chest X-ray of pulmonary congestion, P<0.05. Compared with Mild pulmonary edema group, Moderate and Severe pulmonary edema groups had decreased LVEF, P<0.05; Severe pulmonary edema group showed increased diastolic function such as elevated E/A, pulmonary artery pressure and E/e',P<0.05.B line was positively related to NT-proBNP,E/e'and pulmonary artery pressure,negatively related to EF.B line had the best correlation to NT-proBNP (r=0.803, P<0.001), the next was E/e'(r=0.794, P<0.001) and the worst was pulmonary artery pressure (r=0.330, P<0.001). The cutoff values of B line for diagnosing NT-proBNP≥5000pg/ml and E/e'≥14 were both 30, the AUC of ROC=0.823 and 0.768 respectively. Conclusions: Lung ultrasound B line had good correlation to NT-proBNP and E/e', which could accurately assess the pulmonary edema in AHF patients.