Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Journal of the Korean Child Neurology Society ; (4): 251-262, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-728812

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify changes in smart device usage trends of young children using two studies conducted in 2015-2016 and 2017 respectively. METHODS: We compared the data of the previous study of 130 children (Group A) and the new study of 162 children (Group B). The children and parents were recruited from kindergartens in Seoul and Guri/Namyangju cities. We used the “Parental questionnaire for smart device usage status.” RESULTS: There were some changes in the smart device usage in young children and parental perception. In the 2017 study, smart device usage time increased during weekends (P < 0.05) and the usage with siblings decreased (P < 0.05). In 2017, the smart device was mostly used when children had to be quiet without disturbing others (36.8%). No significant difference existed in the main purpose of use: watching video clips (79.3% vs 76.6%). Overall control of the usage was still largely exercised by mothers; however, when using applications, mothers still only helped the children on request (51.8% vs 49.7%). Regarding the effect of smart device on children, responses of “not knowing” decreased and “will be negative” and “will be positive” increased (P < 0.05). Additionally, most mothers thought that “Although the smart device is currently unnecessary, it will be needed in future” in 2017 (46.3%). CONCLUSION: Limiting the smart device usage time during the weekends and increasing parental involvements are recommended. Guidelines for smart devices usage in young children are also necessary considering the changes in parental attitudes in recognizing the smart device usage as unavoidable.


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Mothers , Parents , Seoul , Siblings , Smartphone
2.
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery ; : 239-245, 2011.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-191362

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-section observational study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the current prescription patterns of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and gastrointestinal (GI) risk assessment in patients with lumbar spine disease. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: NSAIDs are commonly prescribed medications for lumbar spine disease patients. Since the rate of GI complication varies for each patient, identification of individual GI risks is a prerequisite to prevent such a complication. There are few reports about the GI risks in patients with lumbar spine disease who take NSAIDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2264 patients with lumbar degenerative spondylopathy who were taking NSAIDs were enrolled from May 2010 to September 2010. The Standardized Calculator of Risk for Event (SCORE) was used to measure patients' GI risk factors. NSAID prescription patterns and GI protective agents were also investigated. RESULTS: Being aged over 65 (1098 patients; 48.5%) and the presence of GI side-effects from NSAIDs (896 patients; 39.6%) were the most common risk factors. 31.9% and 5.8% percent of patients belonged to each of the high risk and the very high risk groups in GI risk factor analysis. The total prescription rate of gastroprotectants was 91.7% for all patients. However, the prescription rate of selective COX-2 inhibitors in the high risk group was low, and in 54.8% of patients who took COX-2 inhibitors there was GI discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription pattern of GI protective agents was not correlated with GI symptoms. Therefore, physicians should consider NSAID prescription based on the GI risk factors of individual patients.


Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors , Prescriptions , Protective Agents , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Spinal Diseases , Spine
3.
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ; : 1114-1118, 2000.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-151761

ABSTRACT

Neurofibromatosis is a complex hereditary disease involving many organs and systems. The incidence in pregnancy is less frequent and has been reported as 1/5000 to 1/18500 deliveries. Therefore, little is known about the interactions between neurofibromatosis and pregnancy. A survey of relevant literature suggests that patients with NF have an increased risk of perinatal complications (pregnancy induced hypertension, IUGR, preterm labor, abortion, stillbirth, high cesarean section rate) and maternal disease aggravation (rupture of an aneurysm, sarcomatous degeneration of neurofibroma, activation of pheochromocytoma). Refined ultrasound, flow studies and fetal monitoring allow us to provide improved pregnancy care for neurofibromatosis. However, It should be remembered that even now, neurofibromatosis places pregnant women and their fetuses in a high risk group with the potential to develop life threatening complications. We report a case of vertebral artery aneurysm and preeclampsia complicating a pregnancy with neurofibromatosis."


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Aneurysm , Cesarean Section , Fetal Growth Retardation , Fetal Monitoring , Fetus , Genetic Diseases, Inborn , Hypertension , Incidence , Neurofibroma , Neurofibromatoses , Neurofibromatosis 1 , Obstetric Labor, Premature , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnant Women , Stillbirth , Ultrasonography , Vertebral Artery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL