Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 602-603, May-June 2015.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-755857

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

Objective : Ureteral stents are widely used in endo-urological procedures. However, ureteral stents can be forgotten and cause serious complications, including fragmentation, migration and urosepsis.

There are few reports about forgotten and fragmented ureteral stents with stone formation. We aimed to present this rare case with successful combined endo-urological management.

.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Device Removal/methods , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Lithotripsy/methods , Stents/adverse effects , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Cystoscopy/methods , Foreign Bodies/complications , Operative Time , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Ureteroscopy/methods
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 535-541, May-June 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-755876

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACTIntroduction:

Penile prostheses are subject to a continuous development and have gained better mechanical reliability and safety during the last decades. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes and satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and semirigid penile prosthesis (SPP) implantation.

Materials and Methods:

From August 2001 to June 2012, 257 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) underwent penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) at our institution. Of the 257 patients, 118 underwent implantation of IPP and 139 underwent SPP implantation. The pre-operative and post-operative erectile status of the patients were assessed by international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire. The satisfaction of patients and partners were evaluated by a telephone interview using the erectile dysfunction inventory of treatment satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire and EDITS partner survey.

Results:

The overall major complication rate was higher in IPP group. PPI led to a significant improvement in IIEF scores in both groups. For IPP and SPP groups the average EDITS scores were 78±11and 57±8, respectively, and that for the partners were 72±10 and 49±7, respectively (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

Although the IPP implantation have better satisfaction rates, the SPP implantation is still a viable treatment option in the surgical treatment of ED because of low cost and high durability with acceptable satisfaction rates.

.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Prosthesis , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Penile Implantation/methods , Erectile Dysfunction/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications , Prosthesis Design , Penile Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sexual Partners , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL