ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effects of the traditional operation and the new patch technique for the elderly women with pelvic organ prolapse.Methods 60 elderly women with pelvic organ prolapse patients were randomly divided into the traditional group and the modern group with 30 cases.The traditional group was treated with traditional surgery.The madern group was treated by new patch repair.Compare of the operation time,operative blood loss,catheter duration,hospital stay,postoperative recovery and 3 years recurrence rate in two groups.Results The catheter duration and hospital stay of the mederm group were significantly shorter than those of the traditional group (t =8.9471,14.2584,P ＜ 0.05).The postoperative recovery of the new group was better than the traditional group (x2 =5.9341,P ＜ 0.05).The 3 years recurrence rate of the mederm group was significantly lower than those of the traditional group (x2 =4.7059,P ＜ 0.05).The operation time of the mederm group was longer than those of the traditional group (t =4.4631,P ＜ 0.05) and the operative blood loss was more than the traditional group (t =2.0318,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion The effect of the new patchin the treatment of elderly women with pelvic organ prolapse is better than the traditional surgery.