ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study is to analyze and compare the results of conventional surgical repair and endovascular treatment of blunt aortic injury over the past 8 years. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (25 male; mean age, 35 years) were treated for blunt aortic injury between April 2001 and March 2009 in a university hospital in Brazil. Twenty-six patients were included in the study: five were treated with operative repair (OR) and 21 with endovascular treatment (TEVAR). Two patients were excluded from analysis: one was managed conservatively, and one was treated with endovascular treatment for chronic dissection related to aortic trauma. RESULTS: Mean age was lower in the OR group than in the endovascular treatment group (17.8 vs. 38 years, P = .003). There was one death in the OR group and four deaths in the endovascular treatment group. Mean follow-up for the overall group was 33.6 months, with 48.7 months (range 8-83 months) for the OR group, and 29.8 months (range 2-91 months) for the TEVAR group. Mean time elapsed from injury to repair was 23.4 hours (range 8-48 h, median 20 h) for the OR group and 30.3 hours (range 2-240 h, median 18 h) for the TEVAR group (P = .374). The duration of surgery was shorter in the endovascular treatment group (142 versus 237 minutes; P = .005). There were no significant differences with respect to the number of postoperative days requiring mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU stay or duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, endovascular treatment was a safe method for repair of blunt aortic trauma, with immediate and midterm results that were comparable to those results obtained with operative repair. No complications from the stent graft were identified during follow-up. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm the effectiveness of this treatment.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Aorta, Thoracic/injuries , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Brazil , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortalityABSTRACT
Treating narrow arteries and their bifurcations is a major challenge to the endovascular surgeon. We describe a new endovascular technique that was used to treat a narrow aorta and that may also be used to preserve other bifurcations. Using three straight stents may enable the endovascular surgeon to treat bifurcation while maintaining flow to both distal arteries.
O tratamento de artérias de pequeno calibre e suas bifurcações é um grande desafio para o cirurgião endovascular. Descrevemos uma nova técnica endovascular que foi usada no tratamento de uma aorta de pequeno calibre e que também pode ser usada para preservar outras bifurcações. O uso de três stents retos pode permitir ao cirurgião endovascular o tratamento de bifurcação mantendo o fluxo em ambas as artérias distais.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Iliac Artery/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , StentsABSTRACT
Neste artigo, descrevemos o caso de um paciente masculino de 46 anos tratado em nosso Serviço com diagnóstico de abscesso esplênico associado à pileflebite. A apresentaçäo clínica, o diagnóstico, a etiologia e o tratamento dos abscessos esplênicos säo revisados. Discute-se a repercussäo da pileflebite no tratamento e na evoluçäo deste caso.