Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-86958

ABSTRACT

Modern Cardiology was born with the birth of ECG invented by Einthoven in 1903. Since then a galaxy of great pioneers in succession led Cardiology through unprecedented landmark achievements to the present state which is as promising as challenging. This article reviews the journey of Cardiology as a speciality in the last one hundred years of its noteworthy life while highlighting the future directions and challenges the specialty is likely to face."


Subject(s)
Cardiology/history , Forecasting , Heart Function Tests/history , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Thoracic Surgery/history
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-95594

ABSTRACT

The endothelium was earlier regarded as a relatively inert layer performing rather simple physiological functions. However extensive research has recently revealed that the endothelial layer performs a vast array of functions such as maintenance of vascular tone, control over coagulation and fibrinolysis besides a lot of chemical interactions. More recently, endothelial dysfunction has been implicated as important in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia and post-intervention restenosis. The demonstration that endothelial dysfunction may be reversible by employing various strategies raises the possibility of retarding the progress or even preventing the process of atherosclerosis thereby reducing the risk of acute cardiovascular events.


Subject(s)
Arteriosclerosis/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Humans , Risk Factors
4.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-86060

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability, and metabolic effects of prazosin GITS and a sustained release (SR) preparation of nifedipine. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of 26 weeks duration. SETTING: Office practices of 24 physicians in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. PATIENTS: Males and females, aged 30 to 70 yrs, with hypertension of JNC V stage 1 or 2 at the end of a 2-week placebo run-in period, and an abnormal lipid profile. Sufficient number of patients recruited so that at least 60 complete the entire study. INTERVENTIONS: Prazosin GITS (Minipress XL, 2.5-5 mg once daily) or sustained release nifedipine (Nicardia Retard 10-20 mg twice daily) for upto 6 weeks, continued upto 24 weeks in those showing a pre-defined response (SBP and/or DBP normalized, or DBP fall of at least 10 mm Hg with actual value of DBP < 95 mm Hg). Patients allocated to either of the two interventions by randomization. OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent patients showing pre-defined BP response at week 6; percent patients with DBP < 90 mm Hg, SBP < 140 mm Hg, and both; percent patients with DBP fall > or = 10 mm Hg; mean fall in BP among those receiving treatment for 24 weeks; mean change in blood glucose and serum lipids at the end of weeks 8, 16, and 24 of treatment; frequency and intensity of adverse events judged probably or definitely related to the drug. RESULTS: 54 patients randomized to prazosin GITS group and 52 to nifedipine SR group. Of these, 39 in prazosin GITS group (M 23, F 16; mean age-50. 6 yr, SEM 1.66) and 36 in nifedipine SR group (M 20, F 16; mean age-52.3 yr, SEM 1.71) completed the study. Percent patients with DBP < 90 mm Hg at 24 weeks: prazosin GITS--100%, nifedipine SR--100%; SBP < 140 mm Hg: prazosin GITS--94.9%, nifedipine SR--91.7%; both DBP < 90 mm Hg and SBP < 140 mm Hg: prazosin GITS--92.3%, nifedipine SR--91.7%; percent patients with DBP fall of 10 mm Hg or more at 24 weeks: prazosin GITS--76.9%, nifedipine SR--83.3%. The mean fall in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure from the end-of-placebo-phase values to all the other time points was comparable in the 2 groups. Treatment with prazosin GITS did not produce any statistically or clinically significant change in the metabolic parameters at the end of 24 weeks, while with nifedipine SR there was a significant increase in the serum LDL values at 24 weeks (p = 0.009). Adverse events probably or definitely related to the drug: prazosin GITS--1.9%, nifedipine SR--2.1%. CONCLUSION: Both drugs were equally effective and well tolerated. While prazosin GITS was neutral on serum lipids, use of nifedipine SR was associated with a significant increase in serum LDL cholesterol at the end of 24 weeks.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Lipid Metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Nifedipine/administration & dosage , Prazosin/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL