Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
AJAIC-Alexandria Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2004; 7 (2): 103-107
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-96171

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the normal saline preloading versus 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 [voluven] in preventing post spinal hypotension in women undergoing elective caesarian section. 20 patients ASA I or II undergoing elective caesarian section were included in the study. Previous caesarian section patients were excluded from the study. Patients were fasting for 8 hours as regards the solid and semisolid food and 6 hours for the fluids. Patients were divided into 2 groups the first group received one liter 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 [voluven] within 60 minutes before the spinal intrathecal anaesthesia. The second group received two liters normal saline solution within 60 minutes before the spinal anaesthesia. Measurements included systolic and diastolic blood pressure every 3 minutes during the first 15 minutes and then every 5 minutes till the end of surgery. Incidence of hypotension and the total dose of ephedrine sulfate given to each patient were recorded. Facial outcome was judged using Apgar scoring after one and 5 minutes and umbilical artery pH immediately after delivery. The results of the present study showed significant difference between the 2 groups in the systolic blood pressure at the times of 12, 15 and 20 minutes after induction of spinal anaesthesia, blood pressure was significantly higher in the hydroxyethyl starch group. As regards the diastolic blood pressure there was a significant difference between the 2 groups at the time of 12, 15, 20, 25, 30,35 and 40 minutes after induction of spinal anaesthesia. Blood pressure was significantly higher in the hydroxyethyl starch group. Regarding the dose of the ephedrine used in the 2 groups there was a significant difference between the 2 groups only 3 patients in the first group received ephedrine sulfate when the blood pressure decrease to less than 80% of the baselines. While in the second group more patients received ephedrine sulfate in response to the attacks of the hypotension. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the Apgar scoring at one and 5 minutes after delivery. Also the umbilical artery pH was within normal in the 2 groups with no significant difference. The study recommends the use of one liter hydroxyethylstarch [130/0.4] as a volume preload before spinal anaesthesia as this will lead to lesser incidence of hypotension and lesser need for vasopressor therapy


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Hypotension , Protective Agents , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives , Injections, Intravenous , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL