Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Zagazig University Medical Journal. 2000; 6 (5): 254-262
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-56031

ABSTRACT

The offspring of hypertensive patients has a tendency to develop hypertension, so the question of prediction of susceptible individuals is unclear. This Cross-sectional comparative study was designed to clarify some predictors of hypertension in offspring of hypertensive patients. The study included 100 subjects [12 to 18 year old, male and female]; 50 offspring of hypertensive parents [group I] and 50 offspring of normotensive parents [Group II]. They were subjected to full medical history and clinical examination including blood pressure record at rest and after exercise. Also anthropometric assessment was performed. Biochemical assessment for fasting C-peptide insulin level, and plasma level of norepinephrin [NE] were recorded. In group I. the mean resting systolic blood pressure [SBP] was 101.8 +/- 9mmHg, the mean peak SBP 197.2 +/- 27mmHg, the mean resting distolic blood pressure [DBP] was 76.5 +/- 7.5mmHg, the mean peak DBP 71 +/- 9.5mmHg. The mean resting heart rate [HR] was 83.6 +/- 8.7 Beat/min. the mean peak HR was 193.5 +/- 9.I Beat/min. The mean metabolic equivalent [METs] was 12.5 +/- 1.8 MEq. The mean body mass index [BMI] was 30 +/- 5.1 kg/m2. The mean serum insulin level was 23.5 +/- 15.7 micro U/dl and the mean serum NE level was 344.7 +/- 57.1 ng/dl. In group II, the mean resting SBP was 95.1 +/- 16.22mmHg, the mean peak SBP was 172.5 +/- 17.8mmHg; the mean resting DBP was 66.7 +/- 7.7mmHg, the mean peak DBP was 63.4 +/- 6.9mmHg. The mean resting HR was. 80.1 +/- 11.4 Beat/min, the mean peak HR was 188.7 = 6.2 Beat/min. The mean METs was 13.2 +/- 1.8 MEq. The mean BMI was 26.8 +/- 3.6 +/- 5.8 kg/m[2]. The mean serum insulin was 14.7 +/- 15.7 micro U/dl, and mean serum NE was 286.3 +/- 57.1 ng/dl. Both SBP and DBP were within normal limits but were significantly greater in group I than group II. Function capacity was significantly lesser in group I than group II. BMI was significantly greater in group 1 than group II. Serum insulin and NE were significantly increased in group I than group II. However the long-term effect of these risk factors on the cardiovascular system including the coronary arteries need more research


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Risk Factors , Parents , C-Peptide , Body Mass Index , Adolescent , Insulin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL