Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Urology Journal. 2007; 4 (1): 41-45
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-85532

ABSTRACT

We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 11 patients with hydatid cyst of the urinary tract admitted to our institution from 1998 to 2005. Hospital and follow-up records of 11 patients with hydatid cyst of the urinary tract were reviewed and data on the patients' symptoms and signs at presentation, radiological findings, diagnostic tests, pathologic findings, and surgical outcomes were reviewed. The chief complaint was flank pain in 7 patients [63.6%]. Hydaturia was not seen in any of our patients. Ten patients had renal involvement and 1 had a retrovesical hydatid cyst. Eosinophilia was detected in 2 of 11 patients who were tested. A positive indirect hemagglutination test was seen in 4 of 7 patients and a positive Casoni test in 1 of 2. Intravenous urography revealed caliceal distortion in 6 patients [54.5%], caliectasis in 3 [27.3%], and nonfunctioning kidney in 2 [18.2%]. Ultrasonography showed a complex cyst in all of the patients. Computed tomography demonstrated multivesicular cystic structure in 4 patients [36.4%], complex cyst in 4 [36.4%], and a simple cyst in 3 [27.3%]. Definite diagnosis was made only after surgical operation. We performed nephrectomy in 2 patients [18.2%], partial nephrectomy in 2 [18.2%], cystectomy plus marsupialization in 5 [45.4%], and retrovesical surgery in 1 [9.1%]. One patient refused surgical treatment. There was no perioperative major complication. Renal hydatidosis is a rare entity and the main challenge is preoperative diagnosis. Radiological and serologic studies, although indicative, cannot confirm the diagnosis, and only pathologic examination after surgical removal can confirm echinococcal infection


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Echinococcosis/surgery , Urinary Tract Infections/parasitology , Cystectomy
2.
Urology Journal. 2005; 2 (3): 137-140
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-75476

ABSTRACT

The diagnostic value of the urinary bladder cancer [UBC] antigen as a tumor marker is not clear yet. We designed this study to compare the accuracy of the UBC antigen and voided urine cytology in patients with bladder cancer. Fifty-four consecutive patients admitted for a diagnostic workup for bladder cancer were enrolled. Two voided urine samples were taken for urinalysis, both before performing cystoscopy. The samples were examined for urinary urine cytology and UBC antigen. Cystoscopy was done. Resection of pathologic lesion, if any, or random biopsies of multiple foci of the bladder was performed. The results of the diagnostic tests were compared with the pathology examination results. Of 54 patients, 31 had histologically confirmed transitional cell carcinoma. Results were positive for UBC antigen in 28 and for urine cytology in 16 patients. Sensitivities and specificities were 74.2% and 78.3% for UBC antigen, 48.4% and 95.7% for urine cytology, and 87.1% and 73.9% for combined UBC antigen and cytology, respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.42 and 3.03 for UBC antigen, 11.3 and 1.85 for urine cytology, and 3.34 and 5.73 for combined UBC antigen and cytology, respectively. The UBC antigen test had acceptable sensitivity and specificity in our study. However, results of voided urine cytology are significantly more reliable. A combination of tumor markers may help diagnose new tumors and lower the requirements for cystoscopy during follow-up. Further studies are warranted to find a more accurate noninvasive test or a complex of tests comparable with cystoscopy for diagnosis of bladder cancer


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Cystoscopy , Urine/cytology , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL