Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
SQUMJ-Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2010; 10 (3): 350-353
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-143780

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to compare the demographics, semen parameters and hormone profiles in men with primary and secondary infertility. The study was designed as a retrospective analysis of data collected from men attending a combined infertility clinic [seen together by urologist and gynaecologist] from January 2005 to December 2008 at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Oman. Ninety-eight consecutive male patients with one or more abnormalities in semen analysis were referred to the combined infertility clinic. A complete physical examination was carried out by a urologist followed by hormone evaluation of follicle stimulating hormone [FSH], luteinizing hormone [LH], testosterone [T] and prolactin [PRL]. The semen parameters and the sex hormone evaluation were not significantly different between the men with primary and secondary infertility. The men with primary infertility were younger than the men with secondary infertility. A total of 24% of the men in the primary group and 16% in the secondary group were azoospermic with normal gonadotropin values in 9 men and 1 man in the primary and secondary group respectively. Azoospermia was more common in the primary infertile group and, based on gonadotropin levels, obstructive causes seemed more prevalent in the primary group compared to secondary group


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Semen , Spermatozoa , Azoospermia , Demography , Testosterone , Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Luteinizing Hormone , Prolactin
2.
SQUMJ-Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2007; 7 (2): 69-73
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-85287

ABSTRACT

Widespread use of ultrasonography and computerized tomography of the abdomen result in the detection of a large number of renal mass lesions. Most of these are simple renal cysts, which do not need any further evaluation or follow up unless symptomatic. Simple renal cysts can be diagnosed with certainty if the treating physician or surgeon is aware of these features and can avoid unnecessary urology referral, patient anxiety, inconvenience and expense. Symptomatic cysts and complex renal cysts need further evaluation and intervention. We present the case of large symptomatic renal cysts persisting after aspiration sclerotherapy, which were managed by deroofing the cyst laparoscopically. Laparoscopic deroofing is rapidly becoming accepted as the surgical intervention of choice for symptomatic renal cysts persisting after aspiration sclerotherapy


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Stomach , Sclerotherapy , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL