Cost of Neonatal Intensive Care Delivered through District Level Public Hospitals in India.

Objective: To assess the unit cost of level II neonatal intensive care treatment delivered through public hospitals and its fiscal implications in India. Design: Cost analysis study. Setting: Four Special Care Newborn Units (SCNUs) in public sector district hospitals in three Indian states, i.e. Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, for the period 2010. Methods: Bottom-up economic costing methodology was adopted. Health system resources, i.e. capital, equipment, drugs and consumables, non-consumables, referral and overheads, utilized to treat all neonates during 2010 were elicited. Additionally, 360 randomly selected treatment files of neonates were screened to estimate direct out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure borne by the patients. In order to account for variability in prices and other parameters, we undertook a univariate sensitivity analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Unit cost was computed as INR (Indian national rupees) per neonate treated and INR per bed-day treatment in SCNU. Standardized costs per neonate treatment and per bed day were estimated to incorporate the variation in bed occupancy rates across the sites. Results: Overall, SCNU neonatal treatment costs the Government INR 4581 (USD 101.8) and INR 818 (USD 18.2) per neonate treatment and per bed-day treatment, respectively. Standardized treatment costs were estimated to be INR 5090 (USD 113.1) per neonate and INR 909 (USD 20.2) per bed-day treatment. In the event of entire direct medical expenditure being borne by the health system, we found cost of SCNU treatment as INR 4976 (USD 110.6) per neonate and INR 889 (USD 19.8) per bed-day. Conclusions: Level II neonatal intensive care at SCNUs is cost intensive. Rational use of SCNU services by targeting its utilization for the very low birth weight neonates and maintenance of community based home-based newborn care is required. Further research is required on cost-effectiveness of level II neonatal intensive care against routine pediatric ward care.

Does Facility-Based Newborn Care Improve Neonatal Outcomes? A Review of Evidence.

Context: Facility based newborn care is gaining importance as an intervention aiming at reduction of neonatal mortality. Objective: To assess different factors that affect effectiveness of facility based newborn care on neonatal outcomes. Evidence acquisition: Electronic search using key search engines along with search of grey literature manually. Observational and interventional studies published between 1966- Aug 2010 in English having a change in neonatal mortality as an outcome measure were considered. Results: A total of 40 articles were fully reviewed for generating synthesized evidence. All were observational studies. The exposure variables that affected neonatal outcomes were grouped into three categories- regionalization of perinatal care (17 articles), strengthening of lower level neonatal facilities (12), and other miscellaneous factors (11). Regionalization played a key role in advancing newborn care practices. It increased in-utero transfer of high risk newborns and improved survival outcomes especially for very low birth weight neonates at level III facilities. It led to reduction in neonatal mortality owing primarily to enhanced survival of low birth weight infants. Strengthening of lower level units contributed significantly in reducing neonatal mortality. High patient volume (>2,000 deliveries/ year), inborn status, availability of referral system and inter-facility transfers, and adequate nursing care staff in neonatal units also demonstrated protective effect in averting neonatal deaths. Conclusions: Countries investing in facility based newborn care should give impetus to establishing regionalized systems of perinatal care. Strengthening of lower level units with high case loads, can yield optimal reduction in NMR.

Promoting Appropriate Management of Diarrhea: A Systematic Review of Literature for Advocacy and Action: UNICEF-PHFI Series on Newborn and Child Health, India.

Background: Scaling up of evidence-based management and prevention of childhood diarrhea is a public health priority in India, and necessitates robust literature review, for advocacy and action. Objective: To identify, synthesize and summarize current evidence to guide scaling up of management of diarrhea among under-five children in India, and identify existing knowledge gaps. Methods: A set of questions pertaining to the management (prevention, treatment, and control) of childhood diarrhea was identified through a consultative process. A modified systematic review process developed a priori was used to identify, synthesize and summarize, research evidence and operational information, pertaining to the problem in India. Areas with limited or no evidence were identified as knowledge gaps. Results: Childhood diarrhea is a significant public health problem in India; the point (two-weeks) prevalence is 9-20%. Diarrhea accounts for 14% of the total deaths in under-five children in India. Infants aged 6-24 months are at the highest risk of diarrhea. There is a lack of robust nation-wide data on etiology; rotavirus and diarrheogenic E.coli are the most common organisms identified. The current National Guidelines are sufficient for case-management of childhood diarrhea. Exclusive breastfeeding, handwashing and point-of-use water treatment are effective strategies for prevention of all-cause diarrhea; rotavirus vaccines are efficacious to prevent rotavirus specific diarrhea. ORS and zinc are the mainstay of management during an episode of childhood diarrhea but have low coverage in India due to policy and programmatic barriers, whereas indiscriminate use of antibiotics and other drugs is common. Zinc therapy given during diarrhea can be upscaled through existing infrastructure is introducing the training component and information, education and communication activities. Conclusion: This systematic review summarizes current evidence on childhood diarrhea and provides evidence to inform child health programs in India.

Assessment of Implementation of Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness in India.

At the current rate of decline in infant mortality, India is unlikely to achieve the Millennium Development Goal on child survival. Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI), adapted from the global Integrated Management of Childhood Illness to enhance the focus on newborns and on community health workers, is the central strategy within the National Reproductive and Child Health Programme to address high infant mortality. This paper assessed the progress of IMNCI in India, identified the programme bottlenecks, and also assessed the effect on coverage of key newborn and childcare practices. Programme data were analyzed to ascertain the implementation status; rapid programme assessment was conducted for identifying the programme bottlenecks; and results of analysis of two rounds of district-level household surveys were used for comparing the change in the coverage of child-health interventions in IMNCI and control districts. More than 200,000 community health workers and first-level healthcare providers were trained during 2005-2009 at a variable pace across 223 districts. Of the reported births (n=1,102,573), 65.5% were visited by a trained worker within 24 hours, and 63.1% were visited three times within 10 days. Poor supervision and inadequate essential supplies affected the performance of trained workers. During 2004-2008, 12 early-implementing districts had covered most key newborn and child practice indicators compared to the control districts; however, the difference was significant only for care-seeking for acute respiratory infection (net difference: 17.8%; 95% confidence interval 2.3-33.2, p<0.026). Based on the early experience of IMNCI implementation in different states of India, measures need to be taken to improve supportive supervision, availability of essential supplies, and monitoring of the programme if the strategy has to translate into improved child survival in India.

Challenges in Scaling up of Special Care Newborn Units- Lessons from India.

Neonatal mortality rate in India is high and stagnant. Special Care Newborn Units (SCNUs) are being set up to provide quality level II newborn care services in district hospitals of several districts to meet this challenge. The units are located in some of the remotest districts where the burden of neonatal deaths and accessibility to special care is a concern. A recently concluded evaluation of these units indicates that it is possible to provide quality level II newborn care in district hospitals. However, there are critical constraints such as availability and skills of human resources, maintenance of equipment and bed occupancy. It is not the SCNU alone but an active network of SCNU (level II care), neonatal stabilization units (level I care) and newborn care corners can impact neonatal mortality rate reduction higher. Number of beds is also not sufficient to cater to the increasing demand of such services. Available number of nurses is a problem in many such units. An effective and sustainable system to maintain and repair the equipment is essential. Scaling up these units would require squarely addressing these issues.

Assessment of Special Care Newborn Units in India.

The neonatal mortality rate in India is high and stagnant. Special Care Newborn Units (SCNUs) have been set up to provide quality level II newborn-care services in several district hospitals to meet this challenge. The units are located in some remotest districts where the burden of neonatal deaths is high, and access to special newborn care is poor. The study was conducted to assess the functioning of SCNUs in eight rural districts of India. The evaluation was based on an analysis of secondary data from the eight units that had been functioning for at least one year. A cross-sectional survey was also conducted to assess the availability of human resources, equipment, and quality care. Descriptive statistics were used for analyzing the inputs (resources) and outcomes (morbidity and mortality). The rate of mortality among admitted neonates was taken as the key outcome variable to assess the performance of the units. Chi-square test was used for analyzing the trend of case-fatality rate over a period of 3-5 years considering the first year of operationalization as the base. Correlation coefficients were estimated to understand the possible association of case-fatality rate with factors, such as bed:doctor ratio, bed:nurse ratio, average duration of stay, and bed occupancy rate, and the asepsis score was determined. The rates of admission increased from a median of 16.7 per 100 deliveries in 2008 to 19.5 per 100 deliveries in 2009. The case-fatality rate reduced from 4% to 40% within one year of their functioning. Proportional mortality due to sepsis and low birthweight (LBW) declined significantly over two years (LBW <2.5 kg). The major reasons for admission and the major causes of deaths were birth asphyxia, sepsis, and LBW/prematurity. The units had a varying nurse:bed ratio (1:0.5-1:1.3). The bed occupancy rate ranged from 28% to 155% (median 103%), and the average duration of stay ranged from two days to 15 days (median 4.75 days). Repair and maintenance of equipment were a major concern. It is possible to set up and manage quality SCNUs and improve the survival of newborns with LBW and sepsis in developing countries, although several challenges relating to human resources, maintenance of equipment, and maintenance of asepsis remain.

Community Based Newborn Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Evidence: UNICEF-PHFI Series on Newborn and Child Health, India.

Background: The neonatal mortality rate (NMR) in India has remained virtually unchanged in the last 5 years. To achieve the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 on child mortality (two thirds reduction from 1990 to 2015), it is essential to reduce NMR. A systematic review of the evidence on community-based intervention packages to reduce NMR is essential for advocacy and action to reach MDG-4. Objective: To assess the effect of community based neonatal care by community health workers (CHWs) on NMR in resource-limited settings. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Data sources: Electronic databases and hand search of reviews, and abstracts and proceedings of conferences. Results: A total of 13 controlled trials involving about 192000 births were included in this systematic review. Community based neonatal care by CHWs was associated with reduced neonatal mortality in resource-limited settings [RR=0.73 (0.65 to 0.83); P<0.0001]. The identified studies were a heterogeneous mix with respect to the extent and quality of community based neonatal care provided and the characteristics of the CHWs delivering the intervention. There was no consistent effect of training duration of the health workers, type of intervention (home visitation versus community participatory action and learning), number of home visits done by CHWs, and provision of only preventive versus both preventive and therapeutic care. Limited data suggests that the ideal time for the first postnatal visit is the first two days of life. The interventions are highly effective when baseline NMR is above 50/1000 live births [RR=0.64(0.54 to 0.77)]. The interventions show a significant decrease in efficacy as the NMR drops below 50/1000 live births [RR=0.85 (0.73 to 0.99)], however is still substantial. NMR gains from home visitation approach are going to materialize only in the presence of high program coverage of 50% or more. Conclusion: A significant decrease in NMR is possible by providing community based neonatal care in areas with high NMR by community health workers with a modest training duration and ensuring high program coverage with home visitation on the first two days of life.

Acute Respiratory Infection and Pneumonia in India: A Systematic Review of Literature for Advocacy and Action: UNICEF-PHFI Series on Newborn and Child Health, India.

Background: Scaling up of evidence-based management of childhood acute respiratory infection/pneumonia, is a public health priority in India, and necessitates robust literature review, for advocacy and action. Objective: To identify, synthesize and summarize current evidence to guide scaling up of management of childhood acute respiratory infection/pneumonia in India, and identify existing knowledge gaps. Methods: A set of ten questions pertaining to the management (prevention, treatment, and control) of childhood ARI/ pneumonia was identified through a consultative process. A modified systematic review process developed a priori was used to identify, synthesize and summarize, research evidence and operational information, pertaining to the problem in India. Areas with limited or no evidence were identified as knowledge gaps. Results: Childhood ARI/pneumonia is a significant public health problem in India, although robust epidemiological data is not available on its incidence. Mortality due to pneumonia accounts for approximately one-fourth of the total deaths in under five children, in India. Pneumonia affects children irrespective of socioeconomic status; with higher risk among young infants, malnourished children, non-exclusively breastfed children and those with exposure to solid fuel use. There is lack of robust nation-wide data on etiology; bacteria (including Pneumococcus, H. influenzae, S. aureus and Gram negative bacilli), viruses (especially RSV) and Mycoplasma, are the common organisms identified. In-vitro resistance to cotrimoxazole is high. Wheezing is commonly associated with ARI/pneumonia in children, but difficult to appreciate without auscultation. The current WHO guidelines as modified by IndiaCLEN Task force on Penumonia (2010), are sufficient for case-management of childhood pneumonia. Other important interventions to prevent mortality are oxygen therapy for those with severe or very severe pneumonia and measles vaccination for all infants. There is insufficient evidence for protective or curative effect of vitamin A; zinc supplementation could be beneficial to prevent pneumonia, although it has no therapeutic benefit. There is insufficient evidence on potential effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Hib and Pneumococcal vaccines on reduction of ARI specific mortality. Case-finding and community-based management are effective management strategies, but have low coverage in India due to policy and programmatic barriers. There is a significant gap in the utilization of existing services, provider practices as well as family practices in seeking care. Conclusion: The systematic review summarizes current evidence on childhood ARI and pneumonia management and provides evidence to inform child health programs in India.

UNICEF-PHFI Series on Newborn and Child Health, India: Methodology for Systematic Reviews on Child Health Priorities for Advocacy and Action.

India is committed to reducing childhood mortality and morbidity. This requires evidence-based policy and practice in the realm of public health. This in turn necessitates advocacy and action (among all stakeholders), focused on locally relevant issues. A collaboration to work towards this goal was forged between the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), India; and a team of independent researchers. As a first step, a systematic review of literature on four priority areas of newborn care (community-based interventions) and child health (acute respiratory infection, diarrheal disease, anemia), was undertaken to address important issues including epidemiology, interventions for management, and operational issues of planning, implementing, and measuring actions at a programmatic level. This paper describes the development of the methodology for undertaking these systematic reviews including the process for framing of research questions, building a research team, and executing the systematic review (literature search strategy, data extraction, analysis, and reporting). The challenges associated with ensuring robust methodology, are also described.