Melphalan and dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma who are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a disease for which a number of treatment options are available. The choice of therapy is often based on factors such as cost, ease of administration and faster response as the survival rates are similar with most of the regimens. We assessed the efficacy of a combination of melphalan and dexamethasone as first-line therapy in patients with multiple myeloma who were not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with multiple myeloma were included in the study. Patients received a maximum of 12 cycles of chemotherapy consisting of oral melphalan 8 mg/m2 on days 1-4 and oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and days 9-12 every 4 weeks. Patients were assessed for response on the basis of M proteins and a bone marrow biopsy with touch preparation. RESULTS: The median follow up of surviving patients was 40 months. Nine patients (26.1%) had complete response/near complete response (5 had negative immunofixation) and 15 (44%) had partial response. The regimen was well tolerated and there were no therapy-related deaths. The 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method were 53% and 34%, respectively. The median duration of overall and progression-free survivals were 58 and 28 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of melphalan and dexamethasone is safe and effective in patients with multiple myeloma who are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Patient profile and treatment outcome of rectal cancer patients treated with multimodality therapy at a regional cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Incidence of rectal cancer has wide geographical variation. Disease pattern in developing countries is different from developed countries as majority of the patients present in advanced stage because of delayed referral and lack of uniform treatment practices. AIMS: Present study describes the patient profile and treatment results from a tertiary care cancer center in India. SETTING AND DESIGN: Tertiary care Regional cancer center. Retrospective analysis 89 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated between 1995 and 2002 were analyzed. METHODS: Patients with adenocarcinoma rectum were evaluated in a G.I. Oncology clinic and were treated using multimodality protocols involving surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A descriptive analysis of patient and disease profile, treatment patterns and out come was performed. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 45.4 years and majority of them had tumor in lower third of rectum with evidence of extrarectal spread. Seventy five percent of the patients underwent curative resection with abdominoperineal resection being the commonest procedure. Forty seven percent of patients were given short course preoperative radiotherapy and the remaining received postoperative radiotherapy. Sixty four percent of patients could complete planned adjuvant chemotherapy. Operative mortality was 2% and 23% had morbidity. Local recurrence rate was 8.9%. 5-year disease free and overall survival was 54% and 58% respectively. CONCLUSION: Majority of rectal cancer patients present with locally advanced and low rectal growths leading to low sphincter salvage rates. Despite the advanced stage of presentation optimal oncologic results can be obtained by using a good surgical techniques in combination with adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Short course preoperative radiotherapy seems to be more feasible in Indian context. Timely referral and uniform treatment guidelines throughout the country are needed for optimal management of rectal cancer in India.

Etoposide, vinblastine, adriamycin and prednisolone (EVAP) combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment for Hodgkin's disease.

BACKGROUND: Mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone (MOPP) and doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) are well established first-line chemotherapy protocols for the treatment of Hodgkin's disease. The aim of this study was to try a new combination of drugs that individually have a proven efficacy in Hodgkin's disease but have less incidence of severe nausea, vomiting, pulmonary toxicity and sterility. METHODS: This prospective, single-arm study enrolled 66 newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients of Hodgkin's disease with stages IA (bulky)-IVB disease. They were given 6-8 courses of etoposide, vinblastine, doxorubicin and prednisolone (EVAP) as first-line chemotherapy between January 1992 and December 1997. Radiotherapy (RT) was given to the involved fields of those patients who had bulky (> or = 10 cm) stages I or II disease at presentation. The end-points were (i) complete and overall response; (ii) disease-free and overall survival; and (iii) toxicity. RESULTS: Complete response was seen in 78.8% and partial response in 12.2% of patients; the overall response rate was 91%. The median follow up was 48 months. The 5-year overall and disease-free survivals were 72% and 62%, respectively. There were 3 episodes of grade IV neutropenia requiring hospitalization. One patient developed avascular necrosis of the femur. There were 2 deaths during treatment, one due to chemotoxicity, and another due to progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The overall and complete responses were fractionally inferior to the recently published hybrid MOPP/ ABV combination and that of ABVD chemotherapy. The advantages of the EVAP combination are absence of pulmonary toxicity, markedly lower incidence of sterility and nausea and vomiting. EVAP is an attractive option and a randomized trial is warranted to assess its efficacy against established protocols.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary dissection and breast cancer: radiation oncologist's viewpoint.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and biopsy in breast cancer have been carried out successfully since the early 1990s. In early-stage breast cancer, the negative predictive value of a SLN biopsy is as high as 93%-100%. With a negative SLN, no axillary treatment would be required and the breast can be treated by tangential radiation fields. Currently, for a patient with a positive SLN, axillary dissection is recommended. Axillary irradiation can replace surgery with a low risk of recurrence (< 7%). The modern practice of radiotherapy, delivering a dose of 50 Gy to the axilla, has a low rate of late morbidity. Hence, it is now time to plan clinical trials comparing axillary irradiation with axillary dissection in SLN-positive, early-stage breast cancer. These approaches to the axilla, guided by the status of the SLN can reduce arm problems in women with breast cancer and improve their quality of life. Just as the treatment of the primary breast tumour has changed from Halstedian mastectomy to conservation surgery combined with breast irradiation, SLN biopsy may allow a move away from surgical axillary clearance and the associated morbidity in the future.