ABSTRACT
Purpose: To identify factors other than macular edema and retinitis location responsible for poor visual outcomes in epidemic retinitis (ER). Methods: A retrospective, observational, comparative study. Eyes with corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA) 20/200 or worse at resolution formed Group A. Eyes with central macular thickness (CMT) 600 ?m or worse and retinitis within 1500 ?m to foveal center at the presentation, but improved to CDVA 20/200 or better at the resolution formed Group B. The patient’s history, clinical presentation, imaging, and treatment outcomes were studied and the factors responsible for the final visual outcomes were compared in both groups. Results: Groups A and B included 25 eyes each. The mean CDVA at the presentation was 20/400 (range: 20/125–20000) and 20/320 (range: 20/80–20000), and mean CMT at the presentation was 948.5 ?m (range: 520–1553) and 912.2 ?m (range: 615–1250) in Groups A and B, respectively. All eyes except 1 (Group A) had retinitis lesions within 1500 ?m of foveal center. The mean CDVA at the resolution was 20/400 (range: 20/200–20/20000) and 20/40 (range: 20/20–20/80) in Groups A and B, respectively. Older age, male gender, diabetic status, delayed presentation, poor presenting CDVA, bilaterality, presence of keratic precipitates, disk pallor, retinal thinning, and subfoveal deposits had a statistically significant association, whereas the absence of skin rash, ellipsoid zone loss, negative WIDAL, Weil?Felix test, and delayed doxycycline therapy or use of steroids without doxycycline had a statistically insignificant association with poor visual outcomes. Conclusion: Apart from presenting CMT and location of retinitis, multiple demographic, clinical, and imaging factors can be implicated for poor visual outcomes