ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. Material and Methods: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. Results: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. Conclusion: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material. .
Subject(s)
Friction , Nickel/chemistry , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Brackets , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Titanium/chemistry , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Materials Testing , Orthodontic Wires , Reference Values , Surface PropertiesABSTRACT
No presente artigo, é apresentado um caso clínico de paciente adulto com maloclusão classe II divisão 1. São feitas considerações sobre as possibilidades de tratamento para esse tipo de maloclusão em pacientes sem crescimento. O tratamento de escolha foi a combinação de ortodontia e cirurgia ortognática, com osteotomia sagital para avanço de mandíbula.