Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2015; 35 (1): 108-110
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-161985

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate current epidemiology of several types of oral clefts among the patients receiving treatment at two tertiary care hospitals, namely University Malaya Medical Centre [UMMC] Kuala Lumpur, and Hospital Kota Bharu / Hospital Raja Perumpuan Zainab II [HKB/ HRPZII] Kelantan. This study evaluated the records of 526 cleft lip and palate [CLP] patients with or without additional malformations, who came for treatment during 2003 to 2007. Of the total 526 patients registered in the study hospital records during the study period, 338 were from HKB/ HRPZ II and 188 from UMMC. Majority 86.7% of these patients were in the age group

Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Demography
2.
Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2013; 42 (9): 980-987
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-140849

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer among women in Malaysia. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of explanatory variables on survival time of cervical cancer patients receiving treatment at a hospital in Malaysia. In this retrospective record review study, cervical cancer data obtained from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia [HUSM] was analyzed. The data comprises of 120 patients who had been diagnosed as cervical cancer between 1[st] July 1995 and 30[th] June 2007, and obtained treatment from the hospital. The outcome variable was survival time [in months] from cervical cancer diagnosis to death. A stratified Weibull model was applied to study the effect of explanatory variables on survival time when there was time-dependent covariate in the model. Stage of disease and metastases were important prognostic variables. However, metastasis had been stratified because this variable did not satisfy the proportional hazard assumption. In without metastasis stratum, patients who were diagnosed at stage III and IV are at 2.30 times the risk of death as those in stage I and II. Meanwhile, in with metastasis stratum, patients in stage III and IV group had 3.53 times the hazard faced by patients in stage I and II. The prognosis of cervical cancer patients was dependent upon the stage at diagnosis, after the stratification of the metastasis variable. A poorer prognosis on survival was observed for patients in stage III and IV than those in stage I and II


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Hospitals, University , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Retrospective Studies , Survival , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL