Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Professional Medical Journal-Quarterly [The]. 2015; 22 (6): 782-786
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-166889

ABSTRACT

To compare laparoscopic TEP Inguinal hernioplasty with and without dissection balloon. Observational study. Minimal Invasive Surgical Centre Jamshoro and General Surgical Department at Dow University Hospital, Ojha Campus Karachi. May 2011 and Dec 2012. Twenty [20] male patients with uncomplicated unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia were prospectively randomized in two groups; group A Commercially available dissection balloon and group B. Telescopic dissection for creating TEP working space. We had 20 male patients for this study. The average age was 43.6 and ranging between 17 to 64 years. Only 2 patients 10% had bilateral groin hernia, 4 patients 40% had direct inguinal hernia in group A and 5 patients 50% had direct hernia in group B. Peritoneum was breached in 5 [50%] patients with telescopic dissection. One patient [10%] with bilateral groin hernia in group B had large tear in peritoneum converted to TAPP while other group normal. The incidence of scrotal edema/seroma was greater in group B then group A. 40% patient in group B developed seroma while 0nly 1 [10%] patient with bilateral groin hernia in group A developed seroma. Pain was scored on VAS at 1 and 4 hours after surgery was higher in group B. The mean operation time was 55 min [45-100] in the group with the balloon and 73 min [50-120] in the group without the balloon [p = 0.004]. TEP laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is probably the best option amongst the two techniques used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and dissection with balloon is though costly but more helpful in dissection and safer

2.
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013; 29 (4): 1028-1032
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-130369

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopy has gained clinical acceptance in many subspecialties in the last decade. The conventional open surgery for peritonitis carries significant morbidity and mortality. The present study was done to extend and evaluate benefits of minimally invasive surgery in this subset of patients. This was a prospective study spanning over a period of four years. All those patients diagnosed as having peritonitis on clinical assessment and preoperative investigations and those who were stable enough haemodynamically were included in this study. After initial resuscitation for few hours, they underwent diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy to identify the cause of peritonitis and to confirm the pathology. All cases were done under general anesthesia, using three standard ports at appropriate sites according to pathology. Patients were treated by different procedures either laparoscopically or with laparoscopic assistance after diagnosis. Operative and post operative data was collected and analyzed. Ninety two cases of peritonitis underwent diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy. Mean age of patient was 46.5 years. 24 patients were diagnosed as perforated duodenal, in 14 [58.3%] patients laparoscopic suture repair was done and in 8 [33.3%] small upper midline incision was given and perforation was repaired. Out of 32 patients having perforated appendix, 25 [78.1%] patients laparoscopic appendectomy was done while in 7 [21.8%] perforation was dealt by laparoscopic assistance. Out of 14 patients of ileal perforation 6 [42.8%] with minimal contamination laparoscopic suture was applied, while in 8 [57.1%], perforated loop was brought out by making small window and perforation was closed. All 22 patients with pelvic sepsis needed only aspiration of pus and peritoneal lavage. Only one patient died post operatively and 2 [2.1%] patients developed fistula. 6 [6.5%] patients developed port site infection. Laparoscopic management is feasible, safe and effective surgical option for patients with peritonitis due to different abdominal emergencies in properly selected cases with higher diagnostic yield and a faster postoperative recovery


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Male , Laparoscopy , Prospective Studies , Peritonitis/diagnosis , Disease Management
3.
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 28 (5): 776-780
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-149479

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy in the management of hydatid cysts. All consecutive patients diagnosed with liver hydatid disease were offered laparoscopic management. We performed select conservative procedures using standard laparoscopic instruments after sterilization of the cysts with 20% hypertonic saline. Deroofing, evacuation and partial cystectomy were performed. Omentoplasty was performed, and a drain was placed in the cyst cavity. A total of 63 patients [M:F=48:15] with 75 cysts were managed successfully by laparoscopy. The mean age +/- SD of the patients was 38.59 +/- 11.46 years old. The mean operative time +/- SD was 88.24 +/- 23.52 minutes [range: 52-145 minutes]. The mean size of the cysts was 9.2 cm [range: 5.8-16.5cm]. The mean hospital stay +/- SD was 3.49 +/- 1.16 days [range: 1-7 days]. There was no disease or procedure related mortality. Recurrence of a cyst was observed in 3 [4.76%] cases. Open surgery had to be performed on four patients. There were no major complications; minor biliary leaks were observed in 7 cases and cavity infections in 5 cases. The mean follow-up +/- SD in 51 patients was recorded as 28.9 +/- 31 months. Laparoscopic treatment of hydatid cysts of the liver is safe and effective, with low morbidity and a low recurrence rate in uncomplicated cysts. Despite some of its limitations, the procedure is a good alternative to open surgery in select cases.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL