Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry ; : 477-482, 2011.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-122165

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (uSBS) to enamel prepared with different burs and to determine what type of bur were chosen when a self-etching primer adhesive was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enamel of forty-two human molars were used. They were divided into one of six groups (n = 7), Group 1, coarse (125 - 150 microm) diamond bur; Group 2, standard (106 - 125 microm) diamond bur; Group 3, fine (53 - 63 microm) diamond bur; Group 4, extrafine (20 - 30 microm) diamond bur; Group 5, plain-cut carbide bur (no. 245); Group 6, cross-cut carbide bur (no. 557). Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray Medical Inc.) was bonded to enamel surface. The bonded specimens were subjected to uSBS testing. RESULTS: The uSBS of Group 4 was the highest among groups and it was significantly higher than that of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 6 (p < 0.05), but it was not significantly different from that of Group 5. CONCLUSIONS: Different burs used on enamel surface affected the microshear bond strengths of a self-etching primer adhesive to the enamel surface. In the case of Clearfil SE Bond, extrafine diamond and plain-cut carbide bur are recommended for bonding to enamel.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adhesives , Dental Enamel , Diamond , Methacrylates , Molar , Resin Cements
2.
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry ; : 409-418, 2011.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-208278

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (microSBS) and bonding interfaces of two-step total-etching and self-etching adhesive systems to three etch types of dentin either the acid etched, laser etched or laser and acid etched. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The occlusal dentinal surfaces of thirty human molars were used. They were divided into six groups: group 1, 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE); group 2, Er:YAG laser (KEY Laser 3, KaVo) + Single Bond 2; group 3, Er:YAG laser + 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2; group 4, Clearfil SE Primer + Bond (Kuraray); group 5, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Bond; group 6, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Primer + Bond. The samples were subjected to microSBS testing 24 hr after bonding. Also scanning microscopic evaluations were made on the resin-dentin interfaces of six specimens. RESULTS: The microSBS of group 2 was significantly lower than that of groups 1 and 3 in Single Bond 2 (p < 0.05). There were significant differences among the uSBS of groups 4, 5, and 6 in Clearfil SE Bond (p < 0.05). Very short and slender resin tags were observed in groups 2 and 5. Long and slender resin tags and lateral branches of tags were observed in groups 3 and 6. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of dentin surface using phosphoric acid or self-etching primer improved the adhesion of Er:YAG lased dentin.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adhesives , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Dentin , Molar , Phosphoric Acids , Resin Cements
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL