Pancycle Aortic Incompetence and Double Alternans in Pediatric Heart Failure

A 12?year?old boy presented with bicuspid aortic valve, severe aortic regurgitation, and dilated dysfunctional left ventricle in heart failure. He underwent aortic valve replacement with a 23 mm TTK Chitra heart valve prosthesis (tilting disk). He was gradually weaned off milrinone and noradrenaline in the intensive care. Echocardiography showed severe left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 24%. The radial pulse was regular and of normal volume but exactly half that of the heart rate. Evaluation of the rhythm and echocardiography revealed an interesting hemodynamic phenomenon with double alternans.

Programmed ventricular stimulation in structural heart disease: Implications of patterns of ventricular arrhythmias induced to long-term outcomes

Introduction: Currently available data gives some credence to utility of VT induction studies in patients with stable ischemic cardiomyopathy, there are some unresolved questions as to define sensitive threshold for low-risk and the prognostic relevance of ill sustained or non-specific tachycardia on induction study. We evaluated potential ability of VT inducibility to predict likelihood of SHD (Structural heart disease) patients for subsequent arrhythmic or adverse cardiac events. Material and Methods: All consecutive patients with syncope/documented arrhythmia who had VT induction done were included and patients with VT storm, ACS,uncontrolled HF were excluded. We studied in 4 groups-monomorphic VT, sustained polymorphicVT, ill sustainedVT/VF and no VT/VF induced. The primary-endpoints were e Sudden death, all-cause mortality and secondary-endpoints were e MACE (AICD shock, death,HF, recurrence of VT). We screened 411 patients and included 169 within inducible (n ¼ 79) and non-inducible group (n ¼ 90). Results: There were a higher number of patients with coronary artery disease, LV dysfunction, patients on amiodarone in inducible group and no difference in usage of beta-blockers. Recurrence of VT, composite of MACE was significantly higher in inducible group (p < 0.05). Mortality was not different in 3 groups compared with no VT/VF group. We found that monomorphic VT group had significantly higher MACE as compared to others and also predicted recurrence of VT and AICD shock and showed a trend towards significance for prediction of mortality. Inducible patients on AICD had mortality similar to noninducible group. Conclusion: Induction of monomorphicVT/polymorphicVT with 3extrastimuli is associated with a higher number of MACE events on follow up. Induction of monomorphicVT predicts recurrence of VT/ICD shock.

Study of atrial arrhythmias after surgical or device closure of atrial septal defect

BACKGROUND Device closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) has emerged as a treatment modality for the past 3 decades and has changed the natural history of ASD compared to that of surgical closure. Early intervention in ASD retards the geometrical and electrical remodelling of the atrium that contributes to the development of atrial tachyarrhythmias. We studied the incidence of atrial arrhythmias in patients undergoing surgical and device closure of ASD. METHODS We did this retrospective observational study at a tertiary referral centre, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Patients of all age groups undergoing surgical and device closure of ASD between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2008 were included to compare the incidence and nature of atrial arrhythmias and also analyse the difference in new-onset atrial arrhythmias between the two arms. RESULTS Of 277 patients, 144 with surgical closure and 133 with device closure were followed up for 10–15 years. A larger number of men underwent surgical closure (41.7%) compared to device closure (25.6%). The mean (SD) follow-up was 12.6 (3.7) years in the surgical closure group and 10.9 (2.6) years in the device closure arm. There were a larger number of patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias in the surgical closure group (6.3%) compared to the device closure group (0.8%) at baseline (p=0.02). A significantly larger number of patients had atrial fibrillation in the surgical closure group (5.6%) compared to the device closure group (0.7%) at baseline (p=0.003). Pulmonary hypertension at baseline was present in 38.9% of patients in the surgical closure group and in 23.3% of patients in the device closure group (p=0.006). New-onset atrial arrhythmias occurred in patients ?30 years of age (p=0.006) and exclusively in patients with pulmonary hypertension in the surgical group (3.7%) and in the device closure group (6.6%). This was statistically significant in the device closure group (p=0.05) but not in the surgical closure group (p=0.13). The incidence of new-onset arrhythmias was not statistically significant in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Atrial arrhythmias were significantly more common in patients who underwent surgical or device closure at ? 30 years of age and in patients with pulmonary hypertension. There was no difference in new-onset atrial arrhythmias between the surgical and device closure groups. Our study results suggest that surgical or device closure before 30 years of age and before the development of atrial arrhythmias may be beneficial with respect to the development of atrial arrhythmias.

Tachycardiomyopathy managed by successful ablation of right ventricular outflow tract premature ventricular complexes

Tachycardiomyopathy is a common reversible cause of left ventricular dysfunction. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of this condition is essential to ensure a good prognosis for the patient. We report a case of tachycardiomyopathy due to frequent premature ventricular complexes arising from the right ventricular outflow tract midseptum managed with successful ablation.

Management of a complicated ‘pacemaker pocket’ site infection

Pocket site infection after implantation of a pacemaker is a dreaded complication which requires removing the device and reimplanting it at a contralateral site. Difficulties arise when the patient is dependent on pacing and when there are issues with venous access at the contralateral site. We report a patient with pacemaker pocket site infection with congenital complete heart block managed with explantation of the device, semi-permanent pacing during antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of the device at the contralateral site and management of subtotal subclavian vein stenosis noted during reimplantation.

Supravalvar aortic stenosis: clinical and hemodynamic profile, and surgical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Supravalvar aortic stenosis is the rarest of left ventricular outflow obstructions. Data on this rare entity from India are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 15 patients (13 males, mean age 15.5+/-10.18 years) with a diagnosis of supravalvar aortic stenosis confirmed by cardiac catheterization. Five patients had morphological features of Williams' syndrome. One patient had diffuse while the rest had discrete type of supravalvar aortic stenosis. Five patients did not have any associated lesions. A 9-year-old male had an ascending aortic aneurysm, and 3 patients had associated peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis. One child had a subaortic ventricular septal defect, and another had severe mitral regurgitation. Twelve patients had electrocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. Three patients had mild aortic valvar stenosis while 2 had aortic regurgitation. Six patients had dilated coronary arteries. Two patients with supravalvar aortic gradients of 20 and 40 mmHg were kept on close follow-up. One patient was not willing to undergo surgery while the other is awaiting surgery. Eleven patients underwent surgical correction. Dacron or pericardial patch aortoplasty was done in all the patients. In addition, one patient each underwent pulmonary artery plasty, ventricular septal defect closure, repair of ascending aortic aneurysm, and mitral valve replacement. The patient with diffuse type of supravalvar aortic stenosis underwent augmentation aortoplasty. Two patients died perioperatively. One was lost to follow-up. Two had moderate residual gradients. The rest of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I on follow-up of 6.3+/-4.7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of supravalvar aortic stenosis by single sinus aortoplasty is safe and produces good results.