ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In head and neck reconstructive surgery, the stability of vital signs is important for patient recovery and flap outcome. We aimed to determine the better sedation protocol by comparing two protocols, namaely, midazolam/morphine (MM)-based and remifentanil (RF)-based sedation protocols, in the immediate postoperative settings of head and neck reconstructive surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of patients who underwent reconstructive surgery after the ablation of head and neck cancer involving MM sedation (n=34) or RF sedation (n=28). Parameters related to vital signs, flap outcomes, occurrence of delirium, length of stay and nursing burden were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The length of stay at the intensive care unit and flap outcomes were similar in the two groups. However, blood pressure as measured by frequency of variation was more stable in the RF group than in the MM group. In addition, the number of medical calls from the attending nurse due to the fluctuation of vital signs was less in the RF group than in the MM group. CONCLUSION: RF-based sedation for the postoperative intensive care unit care after head and neck reconstructive surgery is more effective in cases where vital signs are less stable. This type of sedation may decrease the nursing burden for these patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Pressure , Delirium , Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Head , Intensive Care Units , Critical Care , Length of Stay , Neck , Nursing , Postoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Vital SignsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic clues to differentiate tuberculous lymph node infection from nodal metastasis in patients with both papillary thyroid carcinoma and cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients suffering concurrently from papillary thyroid carcinomas with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. Nine of the 11 patients underwent preoperative neck ultrasonography (US) and seven CT scans. Using the surgical pathology as the reference standards, the results of the preoperative diagnostic tools were re-evaluated according to lymph node level-based analysis. US and CT features were also compared between metastatic nodes and tuberculous lymphadenitis. RESULTS: Preoperative CT could localize the involved lymph node levels and differentiate tuberculous infection from metastasis of thyroid carcinoma in only two of seven patients. The site of the involved lymph nodes, the presence of pulmonary tuberculosis, and the tumor volume of the thyroid carcinoma were the clues to diagnose the lymph node status. However, in five of seven cases, CT could not differentiate tuberculosis from metastasis in the lymph nodes. The morphological characteristics of lymph nodes seen on CT and US did not differ between tuberculous infection and metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinomas. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative CT or US does not provide differential information about lymph node status between tuberculous infection and metastasis in patients with concurrent papillary thyroid carcinomas and cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. Rather, clinical characteristics such as the site of the involved lymph nodes, the primary tumor burden, and the associated clinical features can help the physician differentiate between them.