Atypical Multiple Myeloma Case: Atypical Clinical Presentation, in Female and at Young Age

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is ranked as the 14th most prevalent cancer, making up 1.8% of all cancers and 10% of blood cancers, rarely seen below 35 years. MM presented aggressively in the young age group, including greater incidences of extramedullary plasmacytomas, plasma cell leukemia (11%), osteolytic lesions, kidney failure (25%), and Bence Jones proteinuria (81%). Though youngsters have an aggressive presentation, their response to treatment is as similar to older patients. Case: We reported a case of a young female from the rural Konkan region of Maharashtra with complaints of right limb radicular pain and back pain diagnosed with MM with acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia. First-line treatment for her included conventional chemotherapy mixed with a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib) and intravenous hydration for acute kidney injury and hypercalcemia with injection (inj) zoledronate. Conclusion: The case study shows how MM must be ruled out before being considered as a possible diagnosis for a young child who has neurological problems and mass lesions.

Study of the Efficacy of Uptitrating Teneligliptin Dose from Standard Dose (20 mg) to High Dose (40 mg) in Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy for an on-demand treatment of acute bleeding events, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of HemoRel-A® in severe hemophilia A. Methods: A total of 44 male subjects with severe hemophilia A with an annualized bleed rate of 12 while on-demand treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) were enrolled in the study and received HemoRel-A® for bleed treatment. The efficacy of HemoRel-A® was evaluated based on a four-point scale (excellent, good, moderate, or none). Six-point pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment was performed following a single dose of 50 IU/kg in 12 subjects after a 7-day wash-out period. Safety evaluations were performed at each visit and inhibitor testing was performed in all patients at screening and end of study. Results: Forty-four male subjects received at least a single dose of the study medication and were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and safety outcome. In 23 (7.52%) out of the 306 bleeding events, HemoRel-A® efficacy was rated as excellent, in 272 (88.89 %) bleeds it was rated as good, and in 11 (3.68%) bleeding events it was rated as moderate. No failure of efficacy was noted in any of the bleeding events. Thus overall out of 306 bleeding events, 295 (96.41%) showed excellent or good efficacy. Pharmacokinetic assessment based on plasma FVIII activity measured by the chromogenic assay in 12 patients showed comparative results similar to FVIII preparations. A total of 12 adverse events (AEs) were reported in this study. There was no inhibitor development in this previously treated patients (PTP) cohort. Conclusion: HemoRel-A® was established to be efficacious and safe in the treatment of acute bleeding events in subjects with severe hemophilia A.