Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Indian Pediatr ; 2010 Aug; 47(8): 702-706
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-168619

ABSTRACT

Limited resources for hospitalized treatment of India’s nearly 8 million children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) make community management of SAM a priority. Capability to produce sufficient quantities of Ready to Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF) is one component of preparedness for community management of SAM. Production of RUTF is a simple process that consists of grinding, mixing and packaging using widely available equipment. Nitrogen flush packaging increases shelf life to 2 years though it is the most expensive and slowest step of the production process. Being a therapeutic product, quality and safety must be ensured including aflatoxin measurement and estimation of micronutrient and macronutrient content consistently. RUTF can be made in India in several production models – (i) Dairy cooperatives and private manufacturers can produce large quantities to meet regional requirements, (ii) small and niche food manufacturers can produce smaller volumes but have a major presence in most parts of India; and (iii) “hand made” RUTF can be made by “village industries” for immediate local consumption. All the ingredients and equipment for RUTF are widely available in India – RUTF is already being produced in India for export. Concerns from various sections of society will need to be heard before community management of SAM using therapeutic, processed nutritional products can begin. Despite apprehensions about processed RUTFs or the sections of the public health community that press for its use, withholding alternative treatment for one of the largest killers of India’s children must not be the option. It is time public health/ medical communities and civil society come together to make effective community management of SAM an immediate reality.

2.
Indian J Pediatr ; 2001 Nov; 68(11): 1063-70
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-83081

ABSTRACT

Nosocomial infections are a significant problem in pediatric intensive care units. While Indian estimates are not available, western PICUs report incidence of 6-8%. The common nosocomial infections in PICU are bloodstream infections (20-30% of all infections), lower respiratory tract infections (20-35%), and urinary tract infections (15-20%); there may be some differences in their incidence in different PICUs. The risk of nosocomial infections depends on the host characteristics, the number of interventions, invasive procedures, asepsis of techniques, the duration of stay in the PICU and inappropriate use of antimicrobials. Most often the child had endogenous flora, which may be altered because of hospitalization, are responsible for the infections. The common pathogens involved are Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase negative staphylococci, E. coli Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella, enterococci, and candida. Nosocomial pneumonias predominantly occur in mechanically ventilated children. There is no consensus on the optimal approach for their diagnosis. Bloodstream infections are usually attributable to the use of central venous lines; use of TPN and use of femoral site for insertion increase the risk. Urinary tract infections occur mostly after catheterization and can lead to secondary bacteremia. The diagnostic criteria have been discussed in the review. With proper preventive strategies, the nosocomial infection rates can be reduced by up to 50%; handwashing, judicious use of interventions, and proper asepsis during procedures remain the most important practices.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Candidiasis/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Incidence , India/epidemiology , Infant , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Klebsiella Infections/diagnosis , Male , Pseudomonas Infections/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL